10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-19034
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
13-3444607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 Old Saw Mill River Road |
|
|
|
|
Tarrytown, New York
|
|
10591-6707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
(914) 347-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as
of October 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class of Common Stock |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Class A Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
2,351,873 |
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
53,810,695 |
|
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Table of Contents
September 30, 2005
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004 (Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
176,093 |
|
|
|
$ |
95,229 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
131,449 |
|
|
|
|
200,753 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
10,536 |
|
|
|
|
43,102 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
|
3,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
324,958 |
|
|
|
|
343,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
26,020 |
|
|
|
|
52,930 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
64,044 |
|
|
|
|
71,239 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
4,253 |
|
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
$ |
419,275 |
|
|
|
$ |
473,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
$ |
20,599 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,872 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
|
|
12,922 |
|
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
33,521 |
|
|
|
|
34,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
49,373 |
|
|
|
|
56,426 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
282,894 |
|
|
|
|
290,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Stock, convertible, $.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
shares issued and outstanding - 2,351,873 in 2005 and 2,358,373 in
2004 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value; 160,000,000 shares authorized;
shares issued and outstanding - 53,780,333 in 2005 and 53,502,004 in
2004 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
693,426 |
|
|
|
|
675,389 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
(555,608 |
) |
|
|
|
(489,834 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
|
136,381 |
|
|
|
|
182,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
$ |
419,275 |
|
|
|
$ |
473,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract research and
development |
|
|
$ |
11,533 |
|
|
|
$ |
25,621 |
|
|
|
$ |
38,580 |
|
|
|
$ |
94,377 |
|
Research progress payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,770 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
|
|
|
14,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,194 |
|
|
|
|
36,519 |
|
|
|
|
48,769 |
|
|
|
|
126,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
41,116 |
|
|
|
|
32,828 |
|
|
|
|
117,670 |
|
|
|
|
101,306 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
|
7,412 |
|
|
|
|
11,740 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
|
12,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,581 |
|
|
|
|
45,998 |
|
|
|
|
143,663 |
|
|
|
|
125,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
(34,387 |
) |
|
|
|
(9,479 |
) |
|
|
|
(94,894 |
) |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contract income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,640 |
|
|
|
|
42,750 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
|
2,746 |
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
|
7,515 |
|
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
|
(9,035 |
) |
|
|
|
(9,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
|
29,120 |
|
|
|
|
37,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
($ |
34,652 |
) |
|
|
($ |
11,076 |
) |
|
|
($ |
65,774 |
) |
|
|
$ |
38,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
($ |
0.62 |
) |
|
|
($ |
0.20 |
) |
|
|
($ |
1.18 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
($ |
0.62 |
) |
|
|
($ |
0.20 |
) |
|
|
($ |
1.18 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
55,978 |
|
|
|
|
55,468 |
|
|
|
|
55,903 |
|
|
|
|
55,378 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
55,978 |
|
|
|
|
55,468 |
|
|
|
|
55,903 |
|
|
|
|
56,295 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Stock |
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Unearned |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Compensation |
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
53,502 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
675,389 |
|
|
|
($2,299 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
Company 401(k) Savings
Plan contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class A Stock to Common Stock |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted Common Stock under
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,313 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized loss on
marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2005 |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
693,426 |
|
|
|
($811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Deficit |
|
Loss |
|
Equity |
|
Loss |
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
($489,834 |
) |
|
|
($769 |
) |
|
$ |
182,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
Company 401(k) Savings
Plan contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class A Stock to Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted Common Stock under
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(65,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,774 |
) |
|
|
($65,774 |
) |
Change in net unrealized loss on
marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2005 |
|
|
($555,608 |
) |
|
|
($682 |
) |
|
$ |
136,381 |
|
|
|
($65,687 |
) |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
5
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
($ |
65,774 |
) |
|
|
$ |
38,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
11,624 |
|
|
|
|
11,446 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
|
17,624 |
|
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Forgiveness of loan payable to Novartis Pharma AG,
inclusive of accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,770 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
32,566 |
|
|
|
|
(9,337 |
) |
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,338 |
) |
Decrease in inventory |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
Decrease in deferred revenue |
|
|
|
(9,398 |
) |
|
|
|
(35,511 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses,
and other liabilities |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
|
55,325 |
|
|
|
|
(43,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
(10,449 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
|
(91,078 |
) |
|
|
|
(243,971 |
) |
Purchases of restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,076 |
) |
Sales or maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
|
185,882 |
|
|
|
|
238,572 |
|
Maturities of restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,576 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
(4,613 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
90,191 |
|
|
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of stock |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(888 |
) |
Borrowings under loan payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
80,864 |
|
|
|
|
(5,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
95,229 |
|
|
|
|
97,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
$ |
176,093 |
|
|
|
$ |
91,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
6
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Interim Financial Statements
The interim Condensed Financial Statements of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Regeneron or the
Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and disclosures necessary for a
presentation of the Companys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the
opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows for such periods. The results of operations for any interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The December 31, 2004
Condensed Balance Sheet data were derived from audited financial statements, but do not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
2. Per Share Data
The Companys basic net income (loss) per share amounts have been computed by dividing net income
or loss by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock outstanding.
Diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock
and Class A Stock and the common stock equivalents outstanding when dilutive. Common stock
equivalents include: (i) outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards under the Companys
Long-Term Incentive Plans, which are included under the treasury stock method when dilutive, and
(ii) Common Stock to be issued under the assumed conversion of the Companys outstanding
convertible senior subordinated notes, which are included under the if-converted method when
dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the three months ended
September 30, 2004, the Company reported a net loss and, therefore, no common stock equivalents
were included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for such periods, since such
inclusion would have been antidilutive. The calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share are as follows:
7
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net loss (Numerator) |
|
($ |
34,652 |
) |
|
($ |
11,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares, in thousands
(Denominator) |
|
|
55,978 |
|
|
|
55,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
($ |
0.62 |
) |
|
($ |
0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income (loss) (Numerator) |
|
($ |
65,774 |
) |
|
$ |
38,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, in thousands (Denominator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares for basic per share
calculations |
|
|
55,903 |
|
|
|
55,378 |
|
Effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
876 |
|
Effect of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares for
diluted per share calculations |
|
|
55,903 |
|
|
|
56,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share |
|
($ |
1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
($ |
1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of restricted stock awards, and
conversion of convertible debt, which have been excluded from the September 30, 2005 and 2004
diluted per share amounts because their effect would have been antidilutive, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
13,236 |
|
|
|
13,015 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
14.54 |
|
|
$ |
20.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
Conversion price |
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
8
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
13,335 |
|
|
|
10,141 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
$ |
23.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
Conversion price |
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
3. Stock-based Employee Compensation
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. (SFAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the modified prospective
method as described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and
Disclosure. As a result, the Company has begun recognizing expense, in an amount equal to the fair
value of share-based payments (including stock option awards) on their date of grant, over the
vesting period of the awards. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense for the
Company is recognized for (a) all share based payments granted on or after January 1, 2005,
(including replacement options granted under the Companys stock option exchange program which
concluded on January 5, 2005 (see Note 11)) and (b) all awards granted to employees prior to
January 1, 2005 that were unvested on that date. Prior to the adoption of the fair value method,
the Company accounted for stock-based compensation to employees under the intrinsic value method of
accounting set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations. Therefore, compensation expense related to employee stock
options was not reflected in operating expenses in any period prior to the first quarter of 2005
and prior period results have not been restated. For the three months ended September 30, 2005,
non-cash stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock option awards (Stock Option
Expense) totaled $5,374. Stock Option Expense recognized in operating expenses, which includes
$65 of Stock Option Expense previously capitalized in inventory, totaled $5,439 for the three
months ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Stock Option
Expense totaled $16,313, of which $16,166 was recognized in operating expenses and $147 was
capitalized in inventory. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, had the Company
adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation under the
provisions of SFAS 123, Stock Option Expense would
9
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
have totaled $8,037 and $25,547, respectively, and the effect on the Companys net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have been
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
|
($ |
11,076 |
) |
|
|
$ |
38,907 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation
expense included in reported
net income (loss) |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value
based method for all awards |
|
|
|
(8,655 |
) |
|
|
|
(27,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss), basic |
|
|
($ |
19,113 |
) |
|
|
$ |
13,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
($ |
0.20 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
($ |
0.34 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per
share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
($ |
0.20 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
($ |
0.34 |
) |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
The fair value of each option granted under the Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (2000 Incentive Plan) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005
and 2004 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Using
this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility
of the Companys Common Stock price, (ii) the periods of time over which employees and Board
Directors are expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected lives), (iii) expected
dividend yield on the Companys Common Stock, and (iv) risk-free interest rates, which are based on
quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with maturities approximating the options expected
lives. Expected volatility has been estimated based on actual movements in the Companys stock
price over the most recent historical periods equivalent to the options expected lives. Expected
lives are principally based on the Companys limited historical exercise experience with option
grants with similar exercise prices. The expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has never
paid dividends and does not currently anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. The
weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2005
and 2004 was $5.12 and $6.72 per option, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of the
options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $5.79 and $9.68
10
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
per option, respectively. The following table summarizes the weighted average values of the assumptions
used in computing the fair value of option grants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
5.0 years |
|
7.5 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
6.2 years |
|
7.4 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Under the 2000 Incentive Plan, the Company also awards shares of restricted stock. In accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company records unearned compensation in
Stockholders Equity related to these awards. The amount is based on the fair market value of
shares of Common Stock on the grant date of the restricted stock award and is expensed, on a pro
rata basis, over the period that the restrictions lapse. For the three months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004, the Company recognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards of
$482 and $618, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company
recognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards of $1,458 and $1,917,
respectively.
4. Statement of Cash Flows
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are
$252 and $550, respectively, of accrued capital expenditures. Included in accounts payable and
accrued expenses at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are $648 and $752, respectively, of
accrued capital expenditures.
Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are $632 and $917,
respectively, of accrued Company
401(k) Savings Plan contribution expense. In the first quarter of
both 2005 and 2004, the Company contributed 90,385 and 64,333 shares, respectively, of Common Stock
to the 401(k) Savings Plan in satisfaction of these obligations.
11
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Included in marketable securities at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are $1,110 and
$2,607, respectively, of accrued interest income. Included in marketable securities at September
30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are $1,602 and $878, respectively, of accrued interest income.
5. Marketable Securities
The Company has revised the classification of its investments in auction rate securities from cash
and cash equivalents to short-term investments on its balance sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and September 30, 2004. Auction rate securities are securities that have stated maturities beyond
three months, but are priced and traded as short-term investments due to the liquidity provided
through the auction mechanism that generally resets interest rates every 28 or 35 days. The change
in classification resulted in decreases in cash and cash equivalents and corresponding increases in
short-term marketable securities of $6,005 and $20,808 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
and $13,404 at September 30, 2004. The Company held no auction rate securities at September 30,
2005. In addition, the Company revised its statements of cash flows to reflect the purchases and
sales of these securities as investing activities rather than as a component of cash and cash
equivalents, resulting in increases in cash flows from investing activities of $14,803 and $14,230
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $7,404 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. This change in classification had no impact on the Companys previously
reported current assets, net income (loss), or cash flows from operations.
6. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Receivable from the sanofi-aventis Group |
|
|
$ |
9,528 |
|
|
|
$ |
39,362 |
|
Receivable from Merck & Co., Inc. |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
Receivable from The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,345 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
|
|
$ |
43,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in process, and finished products associated with the
production of an intermediate for a Merck & Co., Inc. pediatric vaccine under a long-term
manufacturing agreement which will expire in October 2006.
12
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Inventories as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Raw materials |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
692 |
(1) |
Finished products |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,837 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of reserves of $256. |
8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Accounts payable |
|
|
$ |
3,452 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,407 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
|
7,972 |
|
Accrued clinical trial expense |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
Accrued expenses, other |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
Interest payable on convertible notes |
|
|
|
5,042 |
|
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,599 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) represents the change in net assets of a business enterprise during a
period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive
income (loss) of the Company includes net income (loss) adjusted for the change in net unrealized
gain (loss) on marketable securities. The net effect of income taxes on comprehensive income
(loss) is immaterial. For the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the components of
comprehensive loss are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net loss |
|
|
($34,652 |
) |
|
|
($11,076 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
($34,625 |
) |
|
|
($11,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the components of comprehensive income
(loss) are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
($65,774 |
) |
|
|
$ |
38,907 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on
marketable securities |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
($65,687 |
) |
|
|
$ |
38,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Research and Development Agreements
a. The sanofi-aventis Group
In September 2003, the Company entered into a collaboration agreement (the s-a Agreement) with
Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., now a member of the sanofi-aventis Group, to jointly develop and
commercialize the Companys Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap. In connection with
this agreement, Aventis Pharmaceuticals made a non-refundable up-front payment of $80.0 million and
purchased $45.0 million of newly issued, unregistered shares of the Companys Common Stock.
In January 2005, the Company and sanofi-aventis amended the s-a Agreement to exclude
rights to develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap for eye diseases through local delivery systems,
and these VEGF Trap product rights reverted to Regeneron. In connection with this amendment, sanofi-aventis made a one-time $25.0 million payment to Regeneron in January 2005. Under the
s-a Agreement, as amended, Regeneron and sanofi-aventis will share co-promotion rights
for and profits on sales, if any, from the VEGF Trap, for disease indications included in the
companies collaboration.
Under the s-a Agreement, as amended, agreed upon development expenses incurred by both companies
during the term of the agreement will be funded by sanofi-aventis. If the collaboration
becomes profitable, Regeneron will reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of the VEGF
Trap development expenses, including 50% of the $25.0 million payment received in connection
with the January 2005 amendment to the collaboration agreement, in accordance with a formula based on the amount of development expenses and Regenerons
share of the collaboration profits, or at a faster rate at Regenerons option. In addition, if the
first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product for diseases of the eye through local delivery systems
predates the first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product under the collaboration, Regeneron will
begin reimbursing sanofi-aventis for up to $7.5 million of VEGF Trap development expenses
commencing two years after such initial commercialization outside the collaboration in accordance
with a defined formula, until the first commercial VEGF Trap sale under the collaboration occurs.
14
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
b. The Procter & Gamble Company
On June 30, 2005, the Company and The Procter & Gamble Company agreed to amend their collaboration
agreement (the Collaboration Agreement) entered into as of December 31, 2000. Pursuant to the
terms of the amendment and agreement (the Amendment) entered into by the parties on June 30,
2005, the Company and Procter & Gamble agreed that the research activities of the parties under the
Collaboration Agreement were completed on June 30, 2005, six months prior to the December 31, 2005
expiration date in the Collaboration Agreement. In connection with the Amendment, Procter & Gamble
agreed to make a one-time $5.6 million payment to Regeneron, which was received in July 2005, and
the Company agreed to pay $950 to Procter & Gamble to acquire certain capital equipment owned by
Procter & Gamble and located at the Companys facilities. Procter & Gamble also funded Regenerons
research for the second quarter of 2005 under the terms of the Collaboration Agreement. Procter &
Gamble and the Company divided rights to research programs and pre-clinical product candidates that
were developed during the research term of the Collaboration Agreement. Neither party has the
right to participate in the development or commercialization of the other partys product
candidates. The Company is entitled to receive royalties based on any future product sales of a
Procter & Gamble pre-clinical candidate arising from the collaboration. Neither party is entitled
to receive royalties or other payments based on any other products arising from the collaboration.
c. Amgen Inc.
On November 1, 2005, the Company and Amgen Inc. agreed to terminate their collaboration agreement
(the Amgen Agreement) entered into in August 1990 to develop and attempt to commercialize two
proprietary products. The Company and Amgen also agreed to terminate Amgen-Regeneron Partners, a
partnership established in connection with the Amgen Agreement to complete the development and to
commercialize the two products. There were no ongoing activities to develop these products and
selected financial data of Amgen-Regeneron Partners as of and for the nine months ended September
30, 2005 and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were not significant. The Company
and Amgen were equal partners in Amgen-Regeneron Partners. Neither party is entitled to receive
royalties based on any products arising from the collaboration.
11. Stock Option Exchange Program
In December 2004, the Companys shareholders approved a stock option exchange program. Under the
program, Company regular employees who worked an average of 20 hours per week, other than the
Companys chairman and the Companys president and chief executive officer, were provided the
opportunity to make a one-time election to surrender options granted under the
Companys Long-Term Incentive Plans that had an
15
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
exercise price per share of at least $18.00 and exchange them for replacement options granted under the 2000 Incentive Plan in accordance with the
following exchange ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio |
|
|
(Number of Eligible Options |
|
|
Surrendered and Cancelled for Each |
Exercise Price of Eligible Options |
|
Replacement Option) |
$18.00 to $28.00 |
|
|
1.50 |
|
$28.01 to $37.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
$37.01 and up |
|
|
3.00 |
|
Participation in the stock option exchange program was voluntary, and non-employee directors,
consultants, former employees, and retirees were not eligible to participate. The participation
deadline for the program was January 5, 2005. Eligible employees elected to exchange options with
a total of 3,665,819 underlying shares of Common Stock, and on January 5, 2005, the Company issued
replacement options with respect to a total of 1,977,840 underlying shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $8.50 per share.
12. Segment Reporting
The Companys operations are managed in two business segments: research and development, and
contract manufacturing.
Research and development: Includes all activities related to the discovery of potential
therapeutics for human medical conditions, and the development and commercialization of these
discoveries. Also includes revenues and expenses related to (i) the development of manufacturing
processes prior to commencing commercial production of a product under contract manufacturing
arrangements, and (ii) the supply of specified, ordered research materials using
Regeneron-developed proprietary technology.
Contract manufacturing: Includes all revenues and expenses related to the commercial
production of products under contract manufacturing arrangements. The Company produces an
intermediate for a Merck & Co., Inc. pediatric vaccine under a
long-term manufacturing agreement which will expire in October 2006.
16
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
11,533 |
|
|
$ |
4,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,194 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(35,802 |
) |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
(265 |
)(2) |
|
|
(34,652 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
25,621 |
|
|
$ |
10,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,519 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(11,391 |
) |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
(1,597 |
)(2) |
|
|
(11,076 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
38,580 |
|
|
$ |
10,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,769 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
|
11,624 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
Other contract income |
|
|
30,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,640 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(67,031 |
) |
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
(1,520 |
)(2) |
|
|
(65,774 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
4,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,327 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
72,037 |
|
|
|
5,380 |
|
|
|
341,858 |
(3) |
|
|
419,275 |
|
17
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
112,147 |
|
|
$ |
14,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,927 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
10,663 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
|
11,446 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
9,161 |
|
Other contract income |
|
|
42,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,750 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
41,256 |
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
(5,389 |
)(2) |
|
|
38,907 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
94,658 |
|
|
|
8,416 |
|
|
|
369,611 |
(3) |
|
|
472,685 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Depreciation and amortization related to contract manufacturing is capitalized into
inventory and included in contract manufacturing expense when the product is shipped. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents investment income, net of interest expense related primarily to
convertible notes issued in October 2001. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, restricted marketable
securities, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other assets. |
13. Legal Matters
In May 2003, securities class action lawsuits were commenced against Regeneron and certain of the
Companys officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York. A consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in October 2003. The complaint,
which purports to be brought on behalf of a class consisting of investors in the Companys publicly
traded securities between March 28, 2000 and March 30, 2003, alleges that the defendants misstated
or omitted material information concerning the safety and efficacy of AXOKINE, a product then being
developed by the Company for the treatment of obesity, in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
On August 2, 2005, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement settling all claims against the Company in this lawsuit. The settlement requires no
payment by the Company or any of the individual defendants named in the lawsuit. The Companys
primary insurance carrier agreed to make the required payment under the settlement, which is in an
immaterial amount to the Company. The settlement includes no admission of wrongdoing by the
Company or any of the individual defendants. The settlement must be finally approved by the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York following notice and hearing.
18
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Separately, the plaintiffs and the individual defendants named in the lawsuit entered into a
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, dismissing all claims against the individuals. This voluntary
dismissal shall automatically become a dismissal with prejudice, without costs, upon the court
entering an order and final judgment approving the settlement.
From time to time, the Company is a party to other legal proceedings in the course of the Companys
business. The Company does not expect any such other current legal proceedings to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys business or financial condition.
14. Severance Costs
In September 2005, the Company announced plans to reduce its workforce from 730 to approximately
565 by the end of 2006. The workforce reduction results from plans to narrow the focus of the
Companys research and development efforts, substantial improvements in manufacturing productivity,
the recent expiration of the Companys collaboration with The Procter & Gamble Company, and the
expected completion of contract manufacturing for Merck & Co., Inc. in late 2006. The majority of
the headcount reduction will occur by the end of 2005, with the remainder planned for 2006
following the completion of the Companys contract manufacturing activities for Merck.
Details of the workforce reduction plan and related severance benefits were communicated to
employees in October 2005. The Company estimates that costs associated with the workforce
reduction, which will be comprised principally of severance payments and related payroll taxes,
employee benefits, and outplacement services, will total between $2.5 million and $3.0 million, the
substantial majority of which will be cash expenditures. These costs will be accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The
Company did not recognize costs associated with the workforce reduction in the quarter ended
September 30, 2005. The Company expects to incur between $1.8 million and $2.0 million of these
workforce reduction costs in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the remainder in 2006.
15. Future Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (which we adopted effective January 1, 2005 see Note 3),
and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related
implementation guidance. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, and requires the recognition
of compensation expense in an amount equal to
19
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
the fair value of the share-based payment (including stock options and restricted stock) issued to employees. SFAS 123R is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. In March 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) which expresses views of the SEC staff
regarding the application of SFAS 123R. Among other things, SAB 107 provides interpretive guidance
related to the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations as well as the
SEC staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies.
The Company will be required to adopt SFAS 123R effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1,
2006, and intends to do so using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective
method, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date based on (a) the
requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) the
requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective
date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. In addition, the Company will
consider the guidance of SAB 107 as it adopts SFAS 123R. Although the impact of adopting SFAS 123R
has not yet been quantified, management believes that the future adoption of this standard may have
a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS 154 replaces
APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements, and requires retrospective application to prior-period financial statements
of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of a change. SFAS 154 also redefines
restatement as the revising of previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction
of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS
154, as applicable, effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations (FIN 47), which clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement, as used in
SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to perform an
asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 requires that a
liability be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when
incurred, if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Uncertainty about the
timing and method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation would be factored into
the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. FIN 47 is effective no later
than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management believes that the future
adoption of FIN 47 will not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties
relating to future events and the future financial performance of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and actual events or results may differ materially. These statements concern, among other things,
the possible success and therapeutic applications of our product candidates and research programs,
the timing and nature of the clinical and research programs now underway or planned, and the future
sources and uses of capital and our financial needs. These statements are made by us based on
managements current beliefs and judgment. In evaluating such statements, stockholders and
potential investors should specifically consider the various factors identified under the caption
Risk Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such
forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise,
except as required by law.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, and
intends to commercialize pharmaceutical products for the treatment of serious medical conditions.
We are strategically focused in 2005 on the development of the VEGF Trap in oncology, the VEGF Trap
in eye diseases, and the IL-1 Trap in various inflammatory indications in which interleukin-1 is
believed to play a role. Our clinical and preclinical pipeline also includes product candidates
for the treatment of allergies, asthma, and other diseases and disorders. Developing and
commercializing new medicines entails significant risk and expense. Since inception we have not
generated any sales or profits from the commercialization of any of our product candidates.
Our core business strategy is to maintain a strong foundation in basic scientific research and
discovery-enabling technology and combine that foundation with our manufacturing and clinical
development capabilities to build a successful, integrated biopharmaceutical company. Our efforts
have yielded a diverse pipeline of product candidates that we believe has the potential to address
a variety of serious medical conditions. We believe that our ability to develop product candidates
is enhanced by the application of our technology platforms. These platforms are designed to
discover specific genes of therapeutic interest for a particular disease or cell type and validate
targets through high-throughput production of mammalian models. We continue to invest in the
development of enabling technologies to assist in our efforts to identify, develop, and
commercialize new product candidates.
Here is a summary of the clinical status of our clinical candidates as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
VEGF TRAP Oncology: Protein-based product candidate designed to bind Vascular
Endothelial Growth Factor (called VEGF, also known as Vascular Permeability Factor or VPF)
and the related Placental Growth Factor (called PlGF), and prevent their interaction with
cell surface receptors. VEGF (and to a less validated degree, PlGF) is required for the
growth of new blood vessels that are needed for tumors to grow and is a potent |
21
|
|
|
regulator of vascular permeability and leakage. The VEGF Trap is being developed in
collaboration with the sanofi-aventis Group, as described below. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2005, we announced our plans with sanofi-aventis to expand the VEGF Trap
oncology program. The companies plan to initiate up to 19 additional trials for the VEGF
Trap in various cancer indications. Of these, six are new efficacy/safety trials and up to
ten additional trials may be conducted through the National Cancer Institute (NCI) under a
Clinical Trials Agreement between the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program (CTEP), NCI,
and sanofi-aventis. |
|
|
|
|
Three of the efficacy/safety studies are planned to be single-agent trials that will be
conducted in a variety of indications. These studies are planned to begin in the fourth
quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Three other efficacy/safety studies will evaluate the VEGF Trap in combination with standard
chemotherapy regimens in patients with different cancer types. Two of these studies could
begin as early as the second half of 2006, following successful completion of initial
combination safety and tolerability studies. Two safety and tolerability combination
studies were initiated in May and July 2005 and are continuing. A third study was initiated
in October 2005 and two more are scheduled to begin later this year or early next year. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, CTEP plans to sponsor up to ten exploratory efficacy/safety studies evaluating
the VEGF Trap in a variety of cancer types. These trials are planned to start in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2003, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Aventis Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (now a member of the sanofi-aventis Group) to jointly develop and commercialize the
VEGF Trap throughout the world with the exception of Japan, where product rights remain with
us. Under the collaboration agreement, as amended in January 2005, we and sanofi-aventis
will share profits equally on sales, if any, of the VEGF Trap for disease indications
included in our collaboration. Under the terms of the agreement, we may receive up to
$360.0 million in milestone payments upon receipt of specified marketing approvals for up to
eight VEGF Trap indications in Europe or the United States. |
|
|
|
|
Under the collaboration agreement, agreed upon development expenses incurred by both
companies during the term of the agreement will be funded by sanofi-aventis. If the
collaboration becomes profitable, we will reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of the VEGF Trap
development expenses in accordance with a formula based on the amount of development
expenses and our share of the collaboration profit, or at a faster rate at our option. |
|
|
|
|
VEGF TRAP Eye Diseases: VEGF both stimulates angiogenesis and increases vascular
permeability. It has been shown in preclinical studies to be a major pathogenic factor in
diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and age-related macular degeneration and is
believed to be involved in other medical problems affecting the eyes. |
22
|
|
|
In January 2005, we and sanofi-aventis amended our collaboration agreement to exclude rights to develop and
commercialize the VEGF Trap for eye diseases through local
delivery systems. We now have the exclusive right to develop and commercialize the VEGF
Trap for eye diseases through local administration to the eye. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2005, we announced that a Phase 2 trial in patients with the neovascular form
of age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) could begin as early as late 2005 or early
2006. We are completing a Phase 1 trial, initiated in June 2005, of the VEGF Trap delivered
through intravitreal injection to patients with wet AMD. The Phase 1 trial is a two-part,
dose-escalating study designed to assess the safety and tolerability of the VEGF Trap in
patients with wet AMD. In Part A of this trial, patients are receiving a single dose of
the VEGF Trap delivered by intravitreal injection into the eye, after which they are being
evaluated for three months to measure the durability of effects and provide guidance for
dosing regimens to be used in future trials. Following the initial phase of the trial,
Part B will be conducted, in which the safety and tolerability of a single intravitreal
injection of the VEGF Trap will be further evaluated compared with an approved treatment for
wet AMD. |
|
|
|
|
A Phase 1 clinical trial of the VEGF Trap delivered systemically in patients with advanced
wet AMD was completed in 2004, and the results of this study were discussed at the Retinal
Society Meeting in September 2005. The trial successfully met its pre-specified efficacy
endpoint as preliminary results from the trial indicated that the VEGF Trap demonstrated a
statistically significant decrease in excess retinal thickness in treated patients, which
increased in both magnitude and duration with higher doses. The trial results also showed
that the VEGF Trap caused a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure (hypertension), which
appears to be a class-effect of systemically administered anti-VEGF agents. Further
clinical development using systemic delivery of the VEGF Trap for eye diseases is not
currently planned. |
|
|
|
|
INTERLEUKIN-1 TRAP (IL-1 Trap): Protein-based product candidate designed to bind the
interleukin-1 (called IL-1) cytokine and prevent its interaction with cell surface
receptors. IL-1 may play an important role in a number of rheumatological and other
diseases and disorders, including diseases associated with inflammation in blood vessels. |
|
|
|
|
In earlier human clinical trials, the IL-1 Trap demonstrated evidence of clinical activity
and safety in patients who received weekly injections for extended periods of time. In
these trials, patients experienced statistically significant reductions in their levels of
C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, a marker of inflammation, and the improvements in CRP
levels demonstrated a clear dose response to the IL-1 Trap. The IL-1 Trap was generally
well tolerated and no serious drug-related adverse events were reported. In November 2005,
at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, we will report positive preliminary
data from a pilot study indicating that the IL-1 Trap provided prolonged suppression of CRP
in otherwise healthy adults. |
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2004, we initiated a pilot study of the IL-1 Trap in patients with
CIAS1-Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS), a spectrum of rare diseases associated with
mutations in the CIAS1 gene. IL-1 appears to play a significant role in these diseases |
23
|
|
|
and, in December 2004, the FDA granted orphan drug status to the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of
CAPS. In June 2005, we reported positive preliminary results from this
ongoing study in CAPS. We are currently in discussions with the FDA to finalize the design
of a pivotal registration study, which is planned to begin by the end of the year. |
|
|
|
|
We believe blocking IL-1 could also be useful in a number of other potential indications
where inflammation plays a role. Examples include systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic
arthritis (SoJIA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Earlier this year, we initiated a
proof-of-concept study of the IL-1 Trap in PMR. Later this year, we plan to initiate a
proof-of-concept study in SoJIA. The Company does not currently plan to conduct any further
studies of the IL-1 Trap in adult rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. |
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of our March 2003 collaboration agreement with Novartis Pharma AG, we retain
the right to elect to collaborate in the future development and commercialization of a
Novartis IL-1 antibody, which is in clinical development, and Novartis has the right to
elect to collaborate in the development and commercialization of our second generation IL-1
Trap, should we decide to develop this product candidate. |
In addition to our clinical programs, we have research programs focused on angiogenesis,
inflammatory conditions, muscle atrophy, and other diseases and disorders. We also use our
Velocigene® and Trap technology platforms to discover and develop new product candidates
and are developing our VelocimmuneTM platform to create fully human, therapeutic
antibodies.
In June 2005, we and The Procter & Gamble Company amended our Focused Collaboration Agreement
entered into as of December 31, 2000. Under the terms of the modified agreement, the two companies
agreed that the research activities being pursued under the collaboration agreement were completed
on June 30, 2005, six months prior to the December 31, 2005 expiration date in the original
agreement. Procter & Gamble agreed to make a one-time $5.6 million payment to Regeneron, which was
received in July 2005, and to fund Regenerons research for the second quarter of 2005 under the
terms of the collaboration agreement. We agreed to pay Procter & Gamble $950,000 to acquire
certain capital equipment located at our facilities. We and Procter & Gamble divided rights to
research programs and preclinical product candidates that were developed during the research term
of the collaboration. Neither party has the right to participate in the development or
commercialization of the other partys product candidates. We are entitled to receive royalties
based on any future product sales of a Procter & Gamble preclinical candidate arising from the
collaboration. Neither party is entitled to receive either royalties or other payments based on any
other products arising from the collaboration.
Developing and commercializing new medicines entails significant risk and expense. Since
inception we have not generated any sales or profits from the commercialization of any of our
product candidates and may never receive such revenues. Before revenues from the commercialization
of our product candidates can be realized, we (or our collaborators) must overcome a number of
hurdles which include successfully completing research and development and obtaining regulatory
approval from the FDA and regulatory authorities in other countries. In addition, the
biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and new
developments may render our products and technologies uncompetitive or obsolete.
24
From inception on January 8, 1988 through September 30, 2005, we had a cumulative loss of
$555.6 million. In the absence of revenues from the commercialization of our product candidates or
other sources, the amount, timing, nature, or source of which cannot be predicted, our losses will
continue as we conduct our research and development activities. We expect to incur substantial
losses over the next several years as we continue the clinical development of the VEGF Trap and
IL-1 Trap; advance new product candidates into clinical development from our existing research
programs; continue our research and development programs; and commercialize product candidates that
receive regulatory approval, if any.
Our activities may expand over time and may require additional resources, and we expect our
operating losses to be substantial over at least the next several years. Our losses may fluctuate
from quarter to quarter and will depend, among other factors, on the progress of our research and
development efforts, the timing of certain expenses, and the amount and timing of payments that we
receive from collaborators.
The planning, execution, and results of our clinical programs are significant factors that can
affect our operating and financial results. In our clinical programs, 2005 clinical events and
plans for the period through 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Candidate |
|
|
|
2005 Events to Date |
|
|
|
4Q 2005 and 2006 Plans |
VEGF Trap -
Oncology
|
|
|
|
The sanofi-aventis Group
reaffirmed their commitment to the
collaborative development of the VEGF
Trap in oncology
|
|
|
|
Initiate two additional
safety and tolerability
studies of the VEGF Trap in
combination with standard chemotherapy regimens
|
|
|
|
|
Reported positive preliminary
results of Phase 1 trial utilizing
intravenous injections
|
|
|
|
Initiate three efficacy/safety
studies of the VEGF Trap as a single agent in different
cancer indications
|
|
|
|
|
Initiated three Phase 1 studies of
the VEGF Trap in combination with
standard chemotherapy
regimens
|
|
|
|
Prepare to initiate two
efficacy/safety studies of the
VEGF Trap in combination with
standard chemotherapy regimens
in patients with different
cancer types |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finalize agreement for CTEP to
sponsor up to ten exploratory
efficacy/safety studies
evaluating the VEGF Trap in a
variety of cancer types |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Candidate |
|
|
|
2005 Events to Date |
|
|
|
4Q 2005 and 2006 Plans |
VEGF Trap Eye Diseases
|
|
|
|
Reported positive results from
Phase 1 trial in patients with wet AMD
utilizing subcutaneous injections
|
|
|
|
Initiate Phase 2 clinical
trial in eye disease utilizing
intravitreal injections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiated Phase 1 study in
patients with wet AMD utilizing local
delivery by intravitreal injections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IL-1 Trap
|
|
|
|
Completed safety and tolerability
studies of IL-1 Trap at higher doses
|
|
|
|
Initiate exploratory
proof-of-concept trial in SoJIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiated clinical trial in
polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)
|
|
|
|
Complete CAPS proof-of-concept
study and commence additional trial in this indication |
|
|
|
|
Successfully completed initial
treatment Phase of proof-of-concept
study in CAPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued development of IL-1
Trap in adult rheumatoid arthritis and
osteoarthritis |
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Stock-based Employee Compensation
Effective January 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. (SFAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the modified prospective
method as described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and
Disclosure. As a result, we have begun recognizing expense, in an amount equal to the fair value
of share-based payments (including stock option awards) on their date of grant, over the vesting
period of the awards. Under the modified prospective method, we recognize compensation expense for
(a) all share based payments granted on or after January 1, 2005, (including replacement options
granted under our stock option exchange program which concluded on January 5, 2005) and (b) all
awards granted to employees prior to January 1, 2005 that were unvested on that date. Prior to the
adoption of the fair value method, we accounted for stock-based compensation to employees under the
intrinsic value method of accounting set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations. Therefore,
compensation expense related to employee stock options was not reflected in operating expenses in
any period prior to the first quarter of 2005 and prior period operating results have not been
restated. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, non-cash stock-based employee
compensation expense related to stock option awards (Stock Option Expense) totaled $5.4 million.
Stock Option Expense recognized in operating expenses, which includes $0.1 million of Stock Option
Expense previously capitalized in inventory, totaled $5.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Stock Option Expense totaled
$16.3 million, of which $16.2 million was recognized in operating expenses and $0.1 million was
capitalized in inventory.
26
Assumptions
We use the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of each option granted under the
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Using this model, fair value is
calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of our Common Stock price,
(ii) the periods of time over which employees and Board Directors are expected to hold their
options prior to exercise (expected lives), (iii) expected dividend yield on our Common Stock, and
(iv) risk-free interest rates, which are based on quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with
maturities approximating the options expected lives. Expected volatility has been estimated based
on actual movements in our stock price over the most recent historical periods equivalent to the
options expected lives. Expected lives are principally based on our limited historical exercise
experience with option grants with similar exercise prices. The expected dividend yield is zero as
we have never paid dividends and do not currently anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future.
The following table summarizes the weighted average values of the assumptions we used in computing
the fair value of option grants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
5.0 years |
|
6.2 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
Changes in any of these estimates may materially affect the fair value of stock options granted and
the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in any period.
Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Financial Measures:
As described above, effective January 1, 2005, Regeneron began recognizing Stock Option
Expense in accordance with SFAS 123 in each of the categories of expense in our Statement of
Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123, Stock Option Expense was not reflected in operating
expenses and prior period operating results have not been restated.
The discussion of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004 includes certain financial measures that are calculated in a manner different from
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are considered non-GAAP financial measures
under United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. These non-GAAP financial
measures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 are: (1) pro forma net income and
pro forma net income per share (basic and diluted), exclusive of Stock Option Expense and (2)
research and development expenses, general and administrative expenses, and contract manufacturing
expenses, all exclusive of Stock Option Expense. Our management does not intend that the
presentation of non-GAAP financial measures be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
27
Our management believes that the non-GAAP financial measures described above present helpful
information to investors and other users of Regenerons financial statements by providing greater
transparency about the nature of and trends in our operating expenses and net income and a more
useful basis for comparing our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004. In addition, Regenerons management uses non-GAAP financial measures which exclude
Stock Option Expense internally for operating, budgeting, and financial planning purposes. In our
discussion below we have included tables which provide a reconciliation of the differences between
these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable financial measures calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Net Income (Loss):
Regeneron reported a net loss of $34.7 million, or $0.62 per share (basic and diluted), for
the third quarter of 2005 compared with net loss of $11.1 million, or $0.20 per share (basic and
diluted), for the third quarter of 2004. Excluding Stock Option Expense, Regeneron had a pro forma
net loss of $29.2 million, or $0.52 per share (basic and diluted), in the third quarter of 2005 as
follows:
For the three months ended September 30, 2005
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss per Share - |
|
|
Net Loss |
|
Basic and Diluted |
Net loss, as reported |
|
|
($34.7 |
) |
|
|
($0.62 |
) |
Add: Stock Option Expense |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss, exclusive of
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
($29.2 |
) |
|
|
($0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Contract research & development revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sanofi-aventis Group |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract research & development revenue |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
Contract manufacturing revenue |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total revenue decreased to $16.2 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $36.5 million in the
same period of 2004 due primarily to lower revenues related to our collaboration with sanofi-aventis on the VEGF Trap. Contract research and development revenue, as
28
detailed below, consists partly of reimbursement for research and development expenses and partly of the
recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable, up-front payment received from
sanofi-aventis in September 2003. Non-refundable, up-front payments are recorded as deferred
revenue and recognized ratably over the period over which we are obligated to perform services in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104).
Contract research & development revenues earned from sanofi-aventis for the three
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
For the three months ended September 30, 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front Payment to Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
2005 Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
|
Expense |
|
Total |
|
Recognized |
|
Deferred Revenue at |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
Payment |
|
in 2005 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
in 2005 |
Sanofi-aventis
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2004
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front Payment to Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
2004 Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
|
Expense |
|
Total |
|
Recognized |
|
Deferred Revenue at |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
Payment |
|
in 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
in 2004 |
Sanofi-aventis
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
80.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
68.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
Sanofi-aventis reimbursement of Regeneron VEGF Trap expenses decreased in the third
quarter of 2005 from the same period in 2004, primarily due to lower costs in 2005 related to our
manufacture of VEGF Trap clinical supplies. We manufactured clinical supplies of VEGF Trap during
the third quarter of 2004, but not during the third quarter of 2005.
Contract manufacturing revenue relates to our long-term agreement with Merck & Co., Inc. to
manufacture a vaccine intermediate at our Rensselaer, New York facility. Contract manufacturing
revenue decreased to $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $10.9 million in the same
period of 2004 as we shipped less product to Merck. Revenue and the related manufacturing expense
are recognized as product is shipped, after acceptance by Merck. Included in contract
manufacturing revenue in the third quarter of 2005 and 2004 was $0.5 million and $2.4 million,
respectively, of deferred revenue associated with capital improvement reimbursements paid by Merck
prior to commencement of production. This deferred revenue is being recognized as product is
shipped to Merck based on the total amount of product to be shipped
over the term of the agreement. In February 2005, we agreed to extend the manufacturing agreement by one year through
October 2006. As a result, we are recognizing the remaining $2.7 million deferred balance as of
December 31, 2004 of Mercks capital improvement reimbursements as revenue as product is shipped to
Merck, based upon Mercks order quantities through October 2006.
29
Expenses:
Total operating expenses increased to $50.6 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $46.0
million in the same period of 2004. Operating expenses in the third quarter of 2005 include a
total of $5.5 million of Stock Option Expense, as follows:
For the three months ended September 30,
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Expenses as |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses exclusive of |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Reported |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in contract manufacturing expenses is $0.1 million of Stock Option Expense that was
previously capitalized into inventory. Stock Option Expense was not included in operating expenses
in the third quarter of 2004, as reported in our Statement of Operations. In the third quarter of
2004, had we adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation under the provisions of SFAS 123, Stock Option Expense would have totaled $8.0
million. The decrease in total Stock Option Expense of $2.6 million (which excludes the amount
previously capitalized into inventory) in the third quarter of 2005 was partly due to lower
exercise prices of annual employee option grants made by us in December 2004 in comparison to the
exercise prices of annual grants in recent prior years. Exercise prices of these option grants
were generally equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The
decrease in Stock Option Expense in the third quarter of 2005 was also due, in part, to the
exchange of options by eligible employees in connection with our stock option exchange program in
January 2005, as the unamortized fair value of the surrendered options on the date of the exchange
is being recognized as Stock Option Expense over a longer time period (the vesting period of the
replacement options) in accordance with SFAS 123.
Research and Development Expenses:
Research and development expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased to $37.8
million in the third quarter of 2005 from $32.8 million in the same period of 2004. The following
table summarizes the major categories of our research and development expenses for the three months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004:
30
For the three months ended September 30,
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Expenses as |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses exclusive of |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
Reported |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
Reported (2) |
|
Payroll and benefits |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
Clinical trial expenses |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Clinical manufacturing costs (1) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Research and preclinical
development costs |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Occupancy and other operating costs |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the full cost of manufacturing drug for use in research, preclinical
development and clinical trials, including related payroll and benefits, manufacturing
materials and supplies, depreciation, and occupancy costs of our Rensselaer manufacturing
facility. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2004, research and development expenses as reported in our Statement of Operations
did not include Stock Option Expense. |
Payroll and benefits, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased $0.6 million in the
third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as we added research and development
personnel to support our clinical and research programs, especially for the VEGF Trap and IL-1
Trap. Clinical trial expenses increased $5.2 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the
same period in 2004 due primarily to higher IL-1 Trap costs associated with commencing clinical
studies in new indications and discontinuing the Phase 2b study in adult rheumatoid arthritis.
Clinical manufacturing costs, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased $0.7 million in the
third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as higher costs in 2005 related to
manufacturing clinical supplies of IL-1 Trap were partly offset by lower costs related to
manufacturing clinical supplies of VEGF Trap. Research and preclinical development costs decreased
by $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, due primarily to
lower preclinical VEGF Trap development costs and other discovery research expenses in 2005.
Occupancy and other operating costs increased by $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared
to the same period in 2004.
Contract Manufacturing Expenses:
Contract manufacturing expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, decreased to $3.0 million
in the third quarter of 2005 compared to $9.0 million in the same period of 2004, primarily because
we shipped less product to Merck.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased slightly to
$4.3 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $4.2 million in the same period of 2004.
Other Income and Expense:
Investment income increased to $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $1.4 million in
the same period of 2004 due primarily to higher effective interest rates on investment securities
in 2005. Interest expense was $3.0 million for both the third quarter of 2005 and 2004. Interest
31
expense is attributable primarily to $200.0 million of convertible notes issued in October
2001, which mature in 2008 and bear interest at 5.5% per annum.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Net Income (Loss):
Regeneron reported a net loss of $65.8 million, or $1.18 per share (basic and diluted) for the
first nine months of 2005 compared with net income of $38.9 million, or $0.70 per basic share and
$0.69 per diluted share, for the same period of 2004. Excluding Stock Option Expense, Regeneron
had a pro forma net loss of $49.6 million, or $0.89 per share (basic and diluted), in the first
nine months of 2005 as follows:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss per Share - |
|
|
Net Loss |
|
Basic and Diluted |
Net loss, as reported |
|
|
($65.8 |
) |
|
|
($1.18 |
) |
Add: Stock Option Expense |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss, exclusive of
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
($49.6 |
) |
|
|
($0.89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Contract research & development revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanofi-aventis |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
Novartis Pharma AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Procter & Gamble |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract research & development revenue |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
Research progress payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Contract manufacturing revenue |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
|
$ |
127.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total revenue decreased to $48.8 million in the first nine months of 2005 from $127.0 million
in the same period of 2004 due primarily to lower revenues related to our collaboration with
sanofi-aventis on the VEGF Trap and the absence in the 2005 period of revenues related to our
collaboration with Novartis on the IL-1 Trap which ended in 2004. Collaboration revenue earned
from sanofi-aventis and Novartis is comprised of contract research and development
revenue and research progress payments. Contract research and development revenue, as detailed
below, consists partly of reimbursement for research and development expenses and partly of the
recognition of revenue related to non-refundable, up-front payments. Non-refundable, up-front
payments are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the period over which we are
obligated to perform services in accordance with SAB 104.
32
Contract research & development revenues earned from sanofi-aventis and Novartis for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front Payment to Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
2005 Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
|
Expense |
|
Total |
|
Amount Recognized |
|
Deferred Revenue at |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
Payment |
|
in 2005 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
in 2005 |
Sanofi-aventis
|
|
|
$23.4 |
|
|
|
$80.0 |
|
|
|
$7.0 |
|
|
|
$58.8 |
|
|
|
$30.4 |
|
|
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front Payment to Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Regeneron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
|
Expense |
|
Total |
|
Amount Recognized |
|
Deferred Revenue at |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
Payment |
|
in 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
in 2004 |
Sanofi-aventis
|
|
|
$53.8 |
|
|
|
$ 80.0 |
|
|
|
$ 8.2 |
|
|
|
$68.2 |
|
|
|
$62.0 |
|
Novartis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$53.8 |
|
|
|
$107.0 |
|
|
|
$30.3 |
|
|
|
$68.2 |
|
|
|
$84.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanofi-aventis reimbursement of Regeneron VEGF Trap expenses decreased in the first
nine months of 2005 from the same period in 2004, primarily due to lower costs in 2005 related to
our manufacture of VEGF Trap clinical supplies. We manufactured clinical supplies of VEGF Trap
during the first nine months of 2004, but not during the first nine months of 2005. In the first
quarter of 2004, Novartis provided notice of its intention not to proceed with the joint
development of the IL-1 Trap and the remaining balance of the $27.0 million up-front payment
received from Novartis in March 2003 was recognized as contract research and development revenue.
Since the first quarter of 2004, we have not received, and do not expect to receive, any further
contract research and development revenue from Novartis.
In March 2004, Novartis forgave all of its outstanding loans, including interest, to us,
totaling $17.8 million, based upon our achievement of a pre-defined IL-1 Trap development
milestone, which was recognized as a research progress payment.
Contract manufacturing revenue decreased to $10.2 million in the first nine months of 2005
from $14.8 million in the same period of 2004 as we shipped less product to Merck in 2005.
Included in contract manufacturing revenue in both the first nine months of 2005 and 2004 was $1.1
million and $3.0 million, respectively, of deferred revenue associated with capital improvement
reimbursements paid by Merck prior to commencement of production. This deferred revenue is being
recognized as product is shipped to Merck based on the total amount of product to be shipped over
the term of the agreement.
Expenses:
Total operating expenses increased to $143.7 million in the first nine months of 2005 from
$125.2 million in the same period of 2004. Operating expenses in the first nine months of 2005
include a total of $16.2 million of Stock Option Expense, as follows:
33
For the nine months ended September 30,
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Expenses as |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses exclusive of |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Reported |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
117.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
107.6 |
|
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
127.5 |
|
|
$ |
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, $0.1 million of Stock Option Expense was capitalized in inventory, for a total of
$16.3 million of Stock Option Expense recognized in the first nine months of 2005. Stock Option
Expense was not included in operating expenses in the first nine months of 2004, as reported in our
Statement of Operations. In the first nine months of 2004, had we adopted the fair value based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of SFAS 123, Stock
Option Expense would have totaled $25.5 million. The decrease in total Stock Option Expense of
$9.2 million in the first nine months of 2005 was partly due to lower exercise prices of annual
employee option grants made by us in December 2004 in comparison to the exercise prices of annual
grants in recent prior years. Exercise prices of these option grants were generally equal to the
fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The decrease in Stock Option Expense
in the first nine months of 2005 was also due, in part, to the exchange of options by eligible
employees in connection with our stock option exchange program in January 2005, as the unamortized
fair value of the surrendered options on the date of the exchange is being recognized as Stock
Option Expense over a longer time period (the vesting period of the replacement options) in
accordance with SFAS 123.
Research and Development Expenses:
Research and development expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased to $107.6
million in the first nine months of 2005 from $101.3 million in the same period of 2004. The
following table summarizes the major categories of our research and development expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004:
For the nine months ended September 30,
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Expenses as |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses exclusive of |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
Reported |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
Reported (2) |
|
Payroll and benefits |
|
$ |
42.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
Clinical trial expenses |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Clinical manufacturing costs (1) |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Research and preclinical
development costs |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Occupancy and other operating costs |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
117.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
107.6 |
|
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the full cost of manufacturing drug for use in research, preclinical
development and clinical trials, including related payroll and benefits, manufacturing
materials and supplies, depreciation, and occupancy costs of our Rensselaer manufacturing
facility. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2004, research and development expenses as reported in our Statement of Operations
did not include Stock Option Expense. |
34
Payroll and benefits, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased $2.1 million in the
first nine months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as we added research and development
personnel to support our clinical and research programs, especially for the VEGF Trap and IL-1
Trap. Clinical trial expenses increased $8.0 million in the first nine months of 2005 compared to
the same period in 2004 due primarily to higher IL-1 Trap costs associated with commencing clinical
studies in new indications and discontinuing the Phase 2b study in adult rheumatoid arthritis.
Clinical manufacturing costs, exclusive of Stock Option Expense,
decreased $1.8 million in the
first nine months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as lower costs in 2005 related to
manufacturing clinical supplies of VEGF Trap and IL-4/13 Trap were partly offset by higher costs
related to manufacturing clinical supplies of IL-1 Trap. Research and preclinical development
costs decreased by $2.7 million in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the same period in
2004 due primarily to lower preclinical VEGF Trap development costs and other basic discovery
expenses in 2005. Occupancy and other operating costs increased by $0.7 million in the first nine
months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due primarily to higher costs for utilities,
taxes, and operating expenses associated with our leased research facilities in Tarrytown, New
York.
Contract Manufacturing Expenses:
Contract manufacturing expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, decreased to $7.1 million
in the first nine months of 2005 from $11.7 million in the same period of 2004, primarily because
we shipped less product to Merck in 2005.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses, exclusive of Stock Option Expense, increased to $12.8
million in the first nine months of 2005 from $12.2 million in the same period of 2004 due
primarily to higher administrative personnel and facility costs.
Other Income and Expense:
In
June 2005, we and Procter & Gamble amended our collaboration agreement and agreed that the
research activities of both companies under the collaboration agreement were completed. In
connection with the amendment, Procter & Gamble made a one-time $5.6 million payment to
us, which we recognized as other contract income in the second quarter of 2005. In January 2005,
we and sanofi-aventis amended our collaboration agreement to exclude rights to develop
and commercialization the VEGF Trap for eye diseases through local delivery systems. In connection
with the amendment, sanofi-aventis made a one-time $25.0 million payment to us, which was
recognized as other contract income in the first quarter of 2005. In the first quarter of 2004,
Novartis notified us of its decision to forgo its right under the collaboration to jointly develop
the IL-1 Trap and paid us $42.75 million to satisfy its obligation to fund development
costs for the IL-1 Trap for the nine-month period following its notification and for
the two months prior to that notice. The one-time $42.75 million payment was
included in other contract income in the first quarter of 2004.
Investment income increased to $7.5 million in the first nine months of 2005 from $3.6 million
in the same period of 2004 due primarily to higher effective interest rates on investment
35
securities in 2005. Interest expense decreased slightly to $9.0 million in the first nine months
of 2005 from $9.2 million in the same period of 2004. Interest expense is attributable primarily
to $200.0 million of convertible notes issued in October 2001, which mature in 2008 and bear
interest at 5.5% per annum.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception in 1988, we have financed our operations primarily through offerings of
our equity securities, a private placement of convertible debt, revenue earned under our past and
present research and development and contract manufacturing agreements, including our agreements
with sanofi-aventis, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, and Merck, and investment income.
Change in Classification
We have revised the classification of our investments in auction rate securities from cash and
cash equivalents to short-term investments in our previously issued financial statements. Auction
rate securities are securities that have stated maturities beyond three months, but are priced and
traded as short-term investments due to the liquidity provided through the auction mechanism that
generally resets interest rates every 28 or 35 days. The change in classification resulted in a
decrease in cash and cash equivalents and corresponding increase in short-term marketable
securities at each balance sheet date. In addition, we revised our statements of cash flows to
reflect the purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities rather than as a
component of cash and cash equivalents. This change in classification had no impact on our
previously reported current assets, net income (loss), or cash flows from operations. We held no
auction rate securities at September 30, 2005.
The impact of the revision to the classification of our investments in auction rate securities
on previously reported amounts for cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities for the
three month, six month, and nine month periods ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004, and September
30, 2004, respectively, and the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is as follows:
Balance Sheet Impact at December 31, 2004 and 2003
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
As originally reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
$ |
118.3 |
|
Short-term marketable securities |
|
|
194.8 |
|
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
296.0 |
|
|
$ |
282.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised to reflect auction rate securities as
short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
95.2 |
|
|
$ |
97.5 |
|
Short-term marketable securities |
|
|
200.8 |
|
|
|
185.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
296.0 |
|
|
$ |
282.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Statement of Cash Flows Impact for the three month, six month, and nine month periods ended
March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2004, respectively, and the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
As originally reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
$ |
70.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
($12.1 |
) |
|
($ |
4.6 |
) |
|
|
($63.8 |
) |
|
Revised to reflect auction rate securities
as short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
$ |
73.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
($ 4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
|
($49.6 |
) |
These revised amounts, as applicable, are reflected in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005, and will be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations:
At September 30, 2005, we had $333.6 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable
securities compared with $348.9 million at December 31, 2004. In January 2005, we received two
$25.0 million payments from sanofi-aventis. One payment was related to a VEGF Trap
clinical milestone that was earned in December 2004. The second payment related to changes to our
collaboration agreement with sanofi-aventis that were made in January 2005.
In the first nine months of 2005, our net loss was $65.8 million but cash used in our
operations was $10.4 million, principally due to receipts during this period from
sanofi-aventis for (i) reimbursement of VEGF Trap development expenses incurred by us and
(ii) the $25.0 million clinical milestone payment earned in December 2004. In addition, our net
loss in the first nine months of 2005 included $17.6 million of non-cash stock-based employee
compensation costs, of which $16.2 million represents Stock Option Expense resulting from our
adoption of SFAS 123 in January 2005. In the first nine months of 2004, our net income was $38.9
million but we used $4.7 million of cash in operations. The difference between net income and cash
usage was primarily due to the recognition of $39.9 million of non-cash deferred and research
progress payment revenue pursuant to our collaboration agreement with Novartis.
Cash Provided by Investing Activities:
In the first nine months of 2005, net cash provided by investing activities was $90.2 million
compared to net cash used by investing activities of $4.7 million for the same period in 2004. The
increase in net cash provided in 2005 was due to a decrease in purchases of marketable securities,
net of sales and maturities. In the first nine months of 2005, sales or maturities of marketable
securities exceeded purchases by $94.8 million, whereas in the first nine months of 2004, sales or
maturities of marketable securities were offset by purchases.
37
Cash Provided by Financing Activities:
Cash provided by financing activities decreased to $1.1 million in the first nine months of
2005 from $3.6 million in the same period in 2004 due primarily to 2004 borrowings under a loan
from Novartis. In accordance with our collaboration agreement with Novartis, we elected to fund
our share of 2003 IL-1 Trap development expenses through a loan that was forgiven by Novartis in
March 2004 upon our achievement of a pre-defined IL-1 Trap development milestone. In the first
quarter of 2004, we drew $3.8 million, excluding interest, against this loan facility for expenses
incurred during 2003.
The sanofi-aventis Group Agreement:
In January 2005, we and sanofi-aventis amended our collaboration agreement to
exclude rights to develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap for eye diseases through local delivery
systems. In connection with this amendment, sanofi-aventis made a one-time $25.0 million
payment to us. Under the collaboration agreement, as amended, we and sanofi-aventis will
share co-promotion rights for and profits on sales, if any, of the VEGF Trap for disease
indications included in our collaboration. We will manufacture clinical supplies of the VEGF Trap
at our plant in Rensselaer, New York and sanofi-aventis is responsible for providing
commercial scale manufacturing capacity for the VEGF Trap.
Under the collaboration agreement, as amended, agreed upon development expenses incurred by
both companies during the term of the agreement, including costs associated with the manufacture of
clinical drug supply, will be funded by sanofi-aventis. If the collaboration becomes
profitable, we will reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of these development expenses,
including 50% of the $25.0 million payment received in connection with the January 2005 amendment
to our collaboration agreement, in accordance with a formula based on the amount of development
expenses and our share of the collaboration profits, or at a faster rate at our option. In
addition, if the first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product for diseases of the eye through local
delivery systems predates the first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product under the collaboration,
we will begin reimbursing sanofi-aventis for up to $7.5 million of VEGF Trap development
expenses commencing two years after such initial commercialization outside the collaboration in
accordance with a formula until the first commercial VEGF Trap sale under the collaboration occurs.
Capital Expenditures:
Our additions to property, plant, and equipment totaled $4.3 million and $4.7 million for the
first nine months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the remainder of 2005, we expect to incur
approximately $1 million to $2 million in capital expenditures which will primarily consist of
equipment for our manufacturing, research, and development activities.
Severance Costs:
In September 2005, we announced plans to reduce our workforce from 730 to approximately 565 by
the end of 2006. The workforce reduction results from plans to narrow the focus of our
38
research and development efforts, substantial improvements in manufacturing productivity, the recent
expiration of our collaboration with Procter & Gamble, and the expected completion of contract
manufacturing for Merck in late 2006. The majority of the headcount reduction will occur by the
end of 2005, with the remainder planned for 2006 following the completion of our contract
manufacturing activities for Merck.
Details of the workforce reduction plan and related severance benefits were communicated to
employees in October 2005. We estimate that costs associated with the workforce reduction, which
will be comprised principally of severance payments and related payroll taxes, employee benefits,
and outplacement services, will total between $2.5 million and $3.0 million, the substantial
majority of which will be cash expenditures. These costs will be accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. We did not recognize
costs associated with the workforce reduction in the quarter ended September 30, 2005. We expect
to incur between $1.8 million and $2.0 million of these workforce reduction costs in the fourth
quarter of 2005 and the remainder in 2006.
Funding Requirements:
We expect to continue to incur substantial funding requirements primarily for research and
development activities (including preclinical and clinical testing). We currently anticipate that
for all of 2005, approximately 55%-60% of our expenditures will be directed toward the preclinical
and clinical development of product candidates, including the VEGF Trap for oncology, VEGF Trap for
eye diseases, IL-1 Trap, and IL-4/13 Trap; approximately 20%-25% of our expenditures will be
applied to our basic research activities and the continued development of our novel technology
platforms; and the remainder of our expenditures for 2005 will be used for capital expenditures and
general corporate purposes.
The amount we need to fund operations will depend on various factors, including the status of
competitive products, the success of our research and development programs, the potential future
need to expand our professional and support staff and facilities, the status of patents and other
intellectual property rights, the delay or failure of a clinical trial of any of our potential drug
candidates, and the continuation, extent, and success of our
collaboration with sanofi-aventis.
Clinical trial costs are dependent, among other things, on the size and duration of trials,
fees charged for services provided by clinical trial investigators and other third parties, the
costs for manufacturing the product candidate for use in the trials, supplies, laboratory tests,
and other expenses. The amount of funding that will be required for our clinical programs depends
upon the results of our research and preclinical programs and early-stage clinical trials,
regulatory requirements, the clinical trials underway plus additional clinical trials that we
decide to initiate, and the various factors that affect the cost of each trial as described above.
In the future, if we are able to successfully develop, market, and sell certain of our product
candidates, we may be required to pay royalties or otherwise share the profits generated on such
sales in connection with our collaboration and licensing agreements.
Also,
under the terms of the sanofi-aventis collaboration agreement, if the
collaboration becomes profitable, we will reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of the VEGF
Trap development expenses, as previously described above under The sanofi-aventis Group
Agreement. Sanofi-aventis has the right to terminate the agreement without
39
cause with at least twelve months advance notice. Upon termination of the agreement for any reason, any remaining
obligation to reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of the VEGF Trap development expenses will
terminate and we will retain all rights to the VEGF Trap.
We expect that expenses related to the filing, prosecution, defense, and enforcement of patent
and other intellectual property claims will continue to be substantial as a result of patent
filings and prosecutions in the United States and foreign countries.
We believe that our existing capital resources will enable us to meet operating needs through
at least mid-2008. However, this is a forward-looking statement based on our current operating
plan, and there may be a change in projected revenues or expenses that would lead to our capital
being consumed significantly before such time. If there is insufficient capital to fund all of our
planned operations and activities, we believe we would prioritize available capital to fund
preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates. We have no off-balance sheet
arrangements and do not guarantee the obligations of any other entity. As of September 30, 2005,
we had no established banking arrangements through which we could obtain short-term financing or a
line of credit. In the event we need additional financing for the operation of our business, we
will consider collaborative arrangements and additional public or private financing, including
additional equity financing. In January 2005, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3
to sell, in one or more offerings, up to $200.0 million of equity or debt securities, together or
separately, which registration statement was declared effective in February 2005. However, there
is no assurance that we will be able to complete any such offerings of securities. Factors
influencing the availability of additional financing include our progress in product development,
investor perception of our prospects, and the general condition of the financial markets. We may
not be able to secure the necessary funding through new collaborative arrangements or additional
public or private offerings. If we cannot raise adequate funds to satisfy our capital
requirements, we may have to delay, scale-back, or eliminate certain of our research and
development activities or future operations. This could harm our business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, there were no changes to our critical
accounting policies and significant judgments and estimates, as described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Future Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment. SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (which we
adopted effective January 1, 2005), and supersedes APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, and
requires the recognition of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the
share-based payment (including stock options and restricted stock) issued to employees. SFAS 123R
is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. In March 2005, the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) which expresses
views of the SEC staff regarding the
40
application of SFAS 123R. Among other things, SAB 107 provides
interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and
regulations as well as the SEC staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements for public companies. We will be required to adopt SFAS 123R effective for the fiscal
year beginning January 1, 2006, and intend to do so using the modified prospective method. Under
the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date
based on (a) the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective
date and (b) the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the
effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. In addition, we will
consider the guidance of SAB 107 as we adopt SFAS 123R. Although the impact of adopting SFAS 123R
has not yet been quantified, management believes that the future adoption of this standard may have
a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS 154
replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements, and requires retrospective application to prior-period financial
statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of a change. SFAS 154 also redefines
restatement as the revising of previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction
of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 154, as
applicable, effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations (FIN 47) which clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement, as
used in SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are
conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47
requires that a liability be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement
obligation when incurred, if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated.
Uncertainty about the timing and method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation
would be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. FIN 47
is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management
believes that the future adoption of FIN 47 will not have a material impact on our financial
statements.
Risk Factors
We operate in an environment that involves a number of significant risks and uncertainties. We
caution you to read the following risk factors, which have affected, and/or in the future could
affect, our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows. The risks described
below include forward-looking statements, and actual events and our actual results may differ
substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our
business operations. Furthermore, additional risks and uncertainties are described under other
captions in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be considered by our
investors.
41
Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Need for Additional Financing
We have had a history of operating losses and we may never achieve profitability. If we continue to
incur operating losses, we may be unable to continue our operations.
From inception on January 8, 1988 through September 30, 2005, we had a cumulative loss of
$555.6 million. If we continue to incur operating losses and fail to become a profitable company,
we may be unable to continue our operations. We have no products that are available for sale and do
not know when we will have products available for sale, if ever. In the absence of revenue from the
sale of products or other sources, the amount, timing, nature or source of which cannot be
predicted, our losses will continue as we conduct our research and development activities. We
currently receive contract manufacturing revenue from our agreement with Merck and, until June 30,
2005, we received contract research and development revenue from our agreement with Procter &
Gamble. Our agreement with Procter & Gamble expired in June 2005 and our agreement with Merck will
expire before the end of 2006. The expiration of these agreements results in a significant loss of
revenue to the Company
We will need additional funding in the future, which may not be available to us, and which may
force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization
efforts.
We will need to expend substantial resources for research and development, including costs
associated with clinical testing of our product candidates. We believe our existing capital
resources will enable us to meet operating needs through at least mid-2008; however, our projected
revenue may decrease or our expenses may increase and that would lead to our capital being consumed
significantly before such time. We will likely require additional financing in the future and we
may not be able to raise such additional funds. If we are able to obtain additional financing
through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, such sales may be dilutive to our
shareholders. Debt financing arrangements may require us to pledge certain assets or enter into
covenants that would restrict our business activities or our ability to incur further indebtedness
and may contain other terms that are not favorable to our shareholders. If we are unable to raise
sufficient funds to complete the development of our product candidates, we may face delay,
reduction or elimination of our research and development programs or preclinical or clinical
trials, in which case our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially
harmed.
We have a significant amount of debt and may have insufficient cash to satisfy our debt service and
repayment obligations. In addition, the amount of our debt could impede our operations and
flexibility.
We have a significant amount of convertible debt and semi-annual interest payment obligations.
This debt, unless converted to shares of our common stock, will mature in October 2008. We may be
unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make required
payments on our debt. Even if we are able to meet our debt service obligations, the amount of debt
we already have could hurt our ability to obtain any necessary financing in the future for working
capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes. In
42
addition, our debt obligations
could require us to use a substantial portion of cash to pay principal and interest on our debt,
instead of applying those funds to other purposes, such as research and development, working
capital, and capital expenditures.
We have adopted, effective January 1, 2005, the fair market value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation. This will materially increase operating expenses in our
Statement of Operations, primarily due to non-cash compensation costs related to stock options.
We have adopted, effective January 1, 2005, the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation, using the modified prospective method as described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. As a result, we have begun recognizing expense in
an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments (including stock option awards) on their
date of grant over the vesting period of the awards. Although the impact of adopting SFAS 123 has
not been quantified for the full year 2005, in the first nine months of 2005, non-cash stock-based
employee compensation expense of $16.2 million related to stock options awards was recognized in
operating expenses in our Statement of Operations, which decreased our basic net loss per share by
$0.29 per share. Also, if we had adopted SFAS 123 effective January 1, 2004, our net income for
the full year 2004 would have decreased by approximately $33.6 million and our basic and diluted
net income per share in 2004 would have been $0.15 per share instead of $0.75 per share (basic) and
$0.74 per share (diluted).
In addition, in December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, which is a
revision of SFAS 123 and supersedes APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R
requires the recognition of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of
share-based payments (including stock options) issued to employees. We will be required to adopt
SFAS 123R effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The impact of adopting SFAS
123R has not yet been quantified.
The negative impact on our income (loss) as a result of adopting SFAS 123 as of January 1,
2005, and subsequently adopting SFAS 123R commencing January 1, 2006, may negatively affect our
stock price.
Risks Related to Development of Our Product Candidates
Successful development of any of our product candidates is highly uncertain.
Only a small minority of all research and development programs ultimately result in
commercially successful drugs. We have never developed a drug that has been approved for marketing
and sale, and we may never succeed in developing an approved drug. Even if clinical trials
demonstrate safety and effectiveness of any of our product candidates for a specific disease and
the necessary regulatory approvals are obtained, the commercial success of any of our product
candidates will depend upon their acceptance by patients, the medical community, and third-party
payers and on our partners ability to
successfully manufacture and commercialize our product candidates. Our product candidates are
delivered either by intravenous infusion or by intravitreal or subcutaneous injections, which are
generally less well received by patients than
43
tablet or capsule delivery. If our products are not
successfully commercialized, we will not be able to recover the significant investment we have made
in developing such products and our business would be severely harmed.
We intend to study our lead product candidates, the VEGF Trap and IL-1 Trap, in a wide variety
of indications. We intend to study the VEGF Trap in a variety of cancer settings and
ophthalmologic indications and the IL-1 Trap in a wide variety of inflammatory disorders. Most of
these current trials are exploratory studies designed to identify what diseases and uses, if any,
are best suited for our product candidates. It is likely that our product candidates will not
demonstrate the requisite efficacy and/or safety profile to support continued development for most
of the indications that are to be studied. In fact, our product candidates may not demonstrate the
requisite efficacy and safety profile to support the continued development for any of the
indications or uses.
Clinical trials required for our product candidates are expensive and time-consuming, and their
outcome is highly uncertain. If any of our drug trials are delayed or achieve unfavorable results,
we will have to delay or may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.
We must conduct extensive testing of our product candidates before we can obtain regulatory
approval to market and sell them. We need to conduct both preclinical animal testing and human
clinical trials. Conducting these trials is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process. These
tests and trials may not achieve favorable results for many reasons, including, among others,
failure of the product candidate to demonstrate safety or efficacy, the development of serious or
life-threatening adverse events (or side effects) caused by or connected with exposure to the
product candidate, difficulty in enrolling and maintaining subjects in the clinical trial, lack of
sufficient supplies of the product candidate, and the failure of clinical investigators, trial
monitors and other consultants, or trial subjects to comply with the trial plan or protocol. A
clinical trial may fail because it did not include a sufficient number of patients to detect the
endpoint being measured or reach statistical significance. A clinical trial may also fail because
the dose(s) of the investigational drug included in the trial were either too low or too high to
determine the optimal effect of the investigational drug in the disease setting. For example, we
are studying higher doses of the IL-1 Trap in different diseases after a phase 2 trial using lower
doses of the IL-1 Trap in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis failed to achieve its primary
endpoint.
We will need to reevaluate any drug candidate that does not test favorably and either conduct
new trials, which are expensive and time consuming, or abandon the drug development program. Even
if we obtain positive results from preclinical or clinical trials, we may not achieve the same
success in future trials. Many companies in the biopharmaceutical industry, including us, have
suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after promising results have been obtained
in earlier trials. The failure of clinical trials to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for the
desired indication(s) could harm the development of the product candidate(s), and our business,
financial condition, and results of operations may be materially harmed.
44
The development of serious or life-threatening side effects with any of our product candidates
would lead to delay or discontinuation of development, which could severely harm our business.
During the conduct of clinical trials, patients report changes in their health, including
illnesses, injuries, and discomforts, to their study doctor. Often, it is not possible to determine
whether or not the drug candidate being studied caused these conditions. Various illnesses,
injuries, and discomforts have been reported from time-to-time during clinical trials of our
product candidates. Although our current drug candidates appeared to be generally well tolerated in
clinical trials conducted to date, it is possible as we test any of them in larger, longer, and
more extensive clinical programs, illnesses, injuries, and discomforts that were observed in
earlier trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in smaller previous
trials, will be reported by patients. Many times, side effects are only detectable after
investigational drugs are tested in large scale, phase 3 clinical trials or, in some cases, after
they are made available to patients after approval. If additional clinical experience indicates
that any of our product candidates has many side effects or causes serious or life-threatening side
effects, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, which would severely harm
our business.
Our VEGF Trap is being studied for the potential treatment of certain types of cancer and
diseases of the eye. There are many potential safety concerns associated with significant blockade
of vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF. These risks, based on the clinical and preclinical
experience of systemically delivered VEGF inhibitors, including the VEGF Trap, include bleeding,
hypertension, and proteinuria. These serious side effects and other serious side effects have been
reported in our VEGF Trap studies in cancer and diseases of the eye. In addition, patients given
infusions of any protein, including the VEGF Trap delivered through intravenous administration, may
develop severe hypersensitivity reactions, referred to as infusion reactions. These and other
complications or side effects could harm the development of the VEGF Trap for either the treatment
of cancer or diseases of the eye.
Although the IL-1 Trap was generally well tolerated and was not associated with any
drug-related serious adverse events in the phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis study completed in 2003,
safety or tolerability concerns may arise as we test higher doses of the IL-1 Trap in patients with
other inflammatory diseases and disorders. Like TNF-antagonists such as EnbrelÒ (a
registered trademark of Amgen) and RemicadeÒ (a registered trademark of Centocor), the IL-1
Trap affects the immune defense system of the body by blocking some of its functions. Therefore,
there may be an increased risk for infections to develop in patients treated with the IL-1 Trap.
In addition, patients given infusions of the IL-1 Trap have developed hypersensitivity reactions,
referred to as infusion reactions. These and other complications or side effects could harm the
development of the IL-1 Trap.
45
Our product candidates in development are recombinant proteins that could cause an immune response,
resulting in the creation of harmful or neutralizing antibodies against the therapeutic protein.
In addition to the safety, efficacy, manufacturing, and regulatory hurdles faced by our
product candidates, the administration of recombinant proteins frequently causes an immune
response, resulting in the creation of antibodies against the therapeutic protein. The antibodies
can have no effect or can totally neutralize the effectiveness of the protein, or require that
higher doses be used to obtain a therapeutic effect. In some cases, the antibody can cross react
with the patients own proteins, resulting in an auto-immune type disease. Whether antibodies
will be created can often not be predicted from preclinical or clinical experiments, and their
appearance is often delayed, so that there can be no assurance that neutralizing antibodies will
not be created at a later date in some cases even after pivotal clinical trials have been
completed. Subjects who received the IL-1 Trap in clinical trials have developed antibodies. It is
possible that as we test the VEGF Trap with more sensitive assays in different patient populations
and larger clinical trials, we will find that subjects given the VEGF Trap develop antibodies to
the product candidate.
We may be unable to formulate or manufacture our product candidates in a way that is suitable for
clinical or commercial use.
Changes in product formulations and manufacturing processes may be required as product
candidates progress in clinical development and are ultimately commercialized. If we are unable to
develop suitable product formulations or manufacturing processes to support large scale clinical
testing of our product candidates, including the VEGF Trap, IL-1 Trap, and IL-4/13 Trap, we may be
unable to supply necessary materials for our clinical trials, which would delay the development of
our product candidates. Similarly, if we are unable to supply sufficient quantities of our product
or develop product formulations suitable for commercial use, we will not be able to successfully
commercialize our product candidates.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we cannot protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or our patents are insufficient to
protect our proprietary rights, our business and competitive position will be harmed.
Our business requires using sensitive and proprietary technology and other information that we
protect as trade secrets. We seek to prevent improper disclosure of these trade secrets through
confidentiality agreements. If our trade secrets are improperly exposed, either by our own
employees or our collaborators, it would help our competitors and adversely affect our business. We
will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the
extent that our rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained
as trade secrets. The patent position of biotechnology companies involves complex legal and factual
questions and, therefore, enforceability cannot be predicted with certainty. Our patents may be
challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. Patent applications filed outside the United States may
be challenged by third parties who file an opposition. Such opposition proceedings are increasingly
common in the European Union and are costly to defend. We have
46
patent applications that are being opposed and it is likely that we
will need to defend additional patent applications in the future. Our patent rights may not provide
us with a proprietary position or competitive advantages against competitors. Furthermore, even if
the outcome is favorable to us, the enforcement of our intellectual property rights can be
extremely expensive and time consuming.
We may be restricted in our development and/or commercialization activities by, and could be
subject to damage awards if we are found to have infringed, third party patents or other
proprietary rights.
Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the
patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. Other parties may allege that they have
blocking patents to our products in clinical development, either because they claim to hold
proprietary rights to the composition of a product or the way it is manufactured or used.
We are aware of patents and pending applications owned by Genentech that claim certain
chimeric VEGF receptor compositions. Although we do not believe that the VEGF Trap infringes any
valid claim in these patents or patent applications, Genentech could initiate a lawsuit for patent
infringement and assert its patents are valid and cover the VEGF Trap. Genentech may be motivated
to initiate such a lawsuit at some point in an effort to impair our ability to develop and sell the
VEGF Trap, which represents a potential competitive threat to Genentechs VEGF-binding products and
product candidates. An adverse determination by a court in any such potential patent litigation
would likely materially harm our business by requiring us to seek a license, which may not be
available, or resulting in our inability to manufacture, develop and sell the VEGF Trap or in a
damage award.
We are aware of certain United States and foreign patents relating to particular IL-4 and
IL-13 receptors. Our IL-4/13 Trap includes portions of the IL-4 and IL-13 receptors. In addition,
we are aware of a broad patent held by Genentech relating to proteins fused to certain
immunoglobulin domains. Our Trap product candidates include proteins fused to immunoglobulin
domains. Although we do not believe that we are infringing valid and enforceable third party
patents, the holders of these patents may sue us for infringement and a court may find that we are
infringing one or more validly issued patents, which may materially harm our business.
Any patent holders could sue us for damages and seek to prevent us from manufacturing,
selling, or developing our drug candidates, and a court may find that we are infringing validly
issued patents of third parties. In the event that the manufacture, use, or sale of any of our
clinical candidates infringes on the patents or violates other proprietary rights of third parties,
we may be prevented from pursuing product development, manufacturing, and commercialization of our
drugs and may be required to pay costly damages. Such a result may materially harm our business,
financial condition, and results of operations. Legal disputes are likely to be costly and time
consuming to defend.
We seek to obtain licenses to patents when, in our judgment, such licenses are needed. If any
licenses are required, we may not be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms,
if at all. The failure to obtain any such license could prevent us from developing or
47
commercializing any one or more of our product candidates, which could severely harm our business.
Regulatory and Litigation Risks
If we do not obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, we will not be able to market
or sell them.
We cannot sell or market products without regulatory approval. If we do not obtain and
maintain regulatory approval for our product candidates, the value of our company and our results
of operations will be harmed. In the United States, we must obtain and maintain approval from the
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for each drug we intend to sell. Obtaining FDA
approval is typically a lengthy and expensive process, and approval is highly uncertain. Foreign
governments also regulate drugs distributed in their country and approval in any country is likely
to be a lengthy and expensive process, and approval is highly uncertain. None of our product
candidates has ever received regulatory approval to be marketed and sold in the United States or
any other country. We may never receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.
If the testing or use of our products harms people, we could be subject to costly and damaging
product liability claims. We could also face costly and damaging claims arising from employment
law, securities law, environmental law, or other applicable laws governing our operations.
The testing, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of drugs for use in people expose us to
product liability risk. We are currently involved in a product liability lawsuit brought by a
subject who participated in a clinical trial of one of our drug candidates. Any informed consent or
waivers obtained from people who sign up for our clinical trials may not protect us from liability
or the cost of litigation. Our product liability insurance may not cover all potential liabilities
or may not completely cover any liability arising from any such litigation. Moreover, we may not
have access to liability insurance or be able to maintain our insurance on acceptable terms.
Our operations may involve hazardous materials and are subject to environmental, health, and safety
laws and regulations. We may incur substantial liability arising from our activities involving the
use of hazardous materials.
As a biopharmaceutical company with significant manufacturing operations, we are subject to
extensive environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the use
of hazardous materials. Our research and development and manufacturing activities involve the
controlled use of chemicals, viruses, radioactive compounds, and other hazardous materials. The
cost of compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations is substantial. If an
accident involving these materials or an environmental discharge were to occur, we could be held
liable for any resulting damages, or face regulatory actions, which could exceed our resources or
insurance coverage.
48
Changes in the securities laws and regulations have increased, and are likely to continue to
increase, our costs.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which became law in July 2002, has required changes in some of
our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance practices. In response to the
requirements of that Act, the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market have promulgated new rules and
listing standards covering a variety of subjects. Compliance with these new rules and listing
standards has increased our legal costs, and significantly increased our accounting and auditing
costs, and we expect these increased costs to continue. These developments may make it more
difficult and more expensive for us to obtain directors and officers liability insurance.
Likewise, these developments may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
members of our board of directors, particularly independent directors, or qualified executive
officers.
In future years, if we or our independent registered public accounting firm are unable to conclude
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, the market value of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring
public companies to include a report of management on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K that contains an assessment by management of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the independent
registered public accounting firm auditing our financial statements must attest to and report on
managements assessment and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Our independent registered public accounting firm provided us with an unqualified report as to our
assessment and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004, which report was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004. However, we cannot assure you that management or our independent registered public
accounting firm will be able to provide such an assessment or unqualified report as of future
year-ends. In this event, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which could result in a decrease in the market value of our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
If our collaboration with sanofi-aventis for the VEGF Trap is terminated, our business
operations and our ability to develop, manufacture, and commercialize the VEGF Trap in the time
expected, or at all, would be harmed.
We rely heavily on sanofi-aventis to assist with the development of the VEGF Trap
oncology program. Sanofi-aventis funds all of the development expenses incurred by both
companies in connection with the VEGF Trap oncology program. If the VEGF Trap oncology program
continues, we will rely on sanofi-aventis to assist with funding the VEGF Trap program,
provide commercial manufacturing capacity, enroll and monitor clinical trials, obtain regulatory
approval, particularly outside the United States, and provide sales and marketing support. While we
cannot assure you that the VEGF Trap will ever be successfully developed and commercialized, if
sanofi-aventis does not perform its obligations in a timely manner, or at all, our ability to
develop, manufacture, and commercialize the VEGF Trap
49
in cancer indications will be significantly adversely
affected. Sanofi-aventis has the right to terminate its collaboration agreement with us
at any time upon twelve months advance notice. If sanofi-aventis were to terminate its
collaboration agreement with us, we would not have the resources or skills to replace those of our
partner, which could cause significant delays in the development and/or manufacture of the VEGF
Trap and result in substantial additional costs to us. We have no sales, marketing, or distribution
capabilities and would have to develop or outsource these capabilities. Termination of
sanofi-aventis collaboration agreement would create substantial new and additional risks to
the successful development of the VEGF Trap oncology program.
Our collaborators and service providers may fail to perform adequately in their efforts to support
the development, manufacture, and commercialization of our drug candidates.
We depend upon third-party collaborators, including sanofi-aventis and service
providers such as clinical research organizations, outside testing laboratories, clinical
investigator sites, and third-party manufacturers and product packagers and labelers, to assist us
in the development of our product candidates. If any of our existing collaborators or service
providers breaches or terminates its agreement with us or does not perform its development or
manufacturing services under an agreement in a timely manner or at all, we could experience
additional costs, delays, and difficulties in the development or ultimate commercialization of our
product candidates.
Risks Related to the Manufacture of Our Product Candidates
We have limited manufacturing capacity, which could inhibit our ability to successfully develop or
commercialize our drugs.
Before approving a new drug or biologic product, the FDA requires that the facilities at which
the product will be manufactured be in compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or
cGMP requirements. Manufacturing product candidates in compliance with these regulatory
requirements is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. To be successful, our products must be
manufactured for development, following approval, in commercial quantities, in compliance with
regulatory requirements, and at competitive costs. If we or any of our product collaborators or
third-party manufacturers, product packagers, or labelers are unable to maintain regulatory
compliance, the FDA can impose regulatory sanctions, including, among other things, refusal to
approve a pending application for a new drug or biologic product, or revocation of a pre-existing
approval. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be
materially harmed.
Our manufacturing facility is likely to be inadequate to produce sufficient quantities of
product for commercial sale. We intend to rely on our corporate collaborators, as well as contract
manufacturers, to produce the large quantities of drug material needed for commercialization of our
products. We rely entirely on third-party manufacturers for filling and finishing services. We will
have to depend on these manufacturers to deliver material on a timely basis and to comply with
regulatory requirements. If we are unable to supply sufficient material on acceptable terms, or if
we should encounter delays or difficulties in our relationships with our corporate
50
collaborators or contract manufacturers, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be
materially harmed.
We may expand our own manufacturing capacity to support commercial production of active
pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, for our product candidates. This will require substantial
additional funds, and we will need to hire and train significant numbers of employees and
managerial personnel to staff our facility. Start-up costs can be large and scale-up entails
significant risks related to process development and manufacturing yields. We may be unable to
develop manufacturing facilities that are sufficient to produce drug material for clinical trials
or commercial use. In addition, we may be unable to secure adequate filling and finishing services
to support our products. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations
may be materially harmed.
We may be unable to obtain key raw materials and supplies for the manufacture of our product
candidates. In addition, we may face difficulties in developing or acquiring production technology
and managerial personnel to manufacture sufficient quantities of our product candidates at
reasonable costs and in compliance with applicable quality assurance and environmental regulations
and governmental permitting requirements.
If any of our clinical programs are discontinued, we may face costs related to the unused capacity
at our manufacturing facilities.
We have large-scale manufacturing operations in Rensselaer, New York. Under a long-term
manufacturing agreement with Merck, which expires in October 2006, we produce an intermediate for a
Merck pediatric vaccine at our facility in Rensselaer, New York. We also use our facilities to
produce API for our own clinical and preclinical candidates. When we no longer use our facilities
to manufacture the Merck intermediate or if clinical candidates are discontinued, we will have to
absorb overhead costs and inefficiencies.
Certain of our raw materials are single-sourced from third parties; third-party supply failures
could adversely affect our ability to supply our products.
Certain raw materials necessary for manufacturing and formulation of our product candidates
are provided by single-source unaffiliated third-party suppliers. We would be unable to obtain
these raw materials for an indeterminate period of time if these third-party single-source
suppliers were to cease or interrupt production or otherwise fail to supply these materials or
products to us for any reason, including due to regulatory requirements or action, due to adverse
financial developments at or affecting the supplier, or due to labor shortages or disputes. This,
in turn, could materially and adversely affect our ability to manufacture our product candidates
for use in clinical trials, which could materially and adversely affect our business and future
prospects.
Also, certain of the raw materials required in the manufacturing and the formulation of our
clinical candidates may be derived from biological sources, including mammalian tissues, bovine
serum, and human serum albumin. There are certain European regulatory restrictions on using these
biological source materials. If we are required to substitute for these sources to comply with
51
European regulatory requirements, our clinical development activities may be delayed or
interrupted.
Risks Related to Commercialization of Products
If we are unable to establish sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, or enter into
agreements with third parties to do so, we will be unable to successfully market and sell future
products.
We have no sales or distribution personnel or capabilities and have only a small staff with
marketing capabilities. If we are unable to obtain those capabilities, either by developing our own
organizations or entering into agreements with service providers, we will not be able to
successfully sell any products that we may obtain regulatory approval for and bring to market in
the future. In that event, we will not be able to generate significant revenue, even if our product
candidates are approved. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to hire the qualified sales and
marketing personnel we need or that we will be able to enter into marketing or distribution
agreements with third-party providers on acceptable terms, if at all. Under the terms of our
collaboration agreement with sanofi-aventis, we currently rely on sanofi-aventis
for sales, marketing, and distribution of the VEGF Trap in cancer indications, should it be
approved in the future by regulatory authorities for marketing. We will have to rely on a third
party or devote significant resources to develop our own sales, marketing, and distribution
capabilities for our other product candidates, including the VEGF Trap in eye diseases, and we may
be unsuccessful in developing our own sales, marketing, and distribution organization.
Even if our product candidates are ever approved, their commercial success is highly uncertain
because our competitors may get to the marketplace before we do with better or lower cost drugs or
the market for our product candidates may be too small to support commercialization or sufficient
profitability.
There is substantial competition in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries from
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and chemical companies. Many of our competitors have substantially
greater research, preclinical and clinical product development and manufacturing capabilities, and
financial, marketing, and human resources than we do. Our smaller competitors may also enhance
their competitive position if they acquire or discover patentable inventions, form collaborative
arrangements, or merge with large pharmaceutical companies. Even if we achieve product
commercialization, our competitors have achieved, and may continue to achieve, product
commercialization before our products are approved for marketing and sale.
Genentech has an approved VEGF antagonist, Avastin, on the market for treating certain
cancers and many different pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are working to develop
competing VEGF antagonists, including Novartis, Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer. Many of these
molecules are farther along in development than the VEGF Trap and may offer competitive advantages
over our molecule. Novartis has an ongoing phase 3 clinical development program evaluating an
orally delivered VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor in different cancer settings. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
and Bayer have filed an New Drug Application with the FDA for approval to market the first oral
medication that targets tumor cell growth and new vasculature formation that fuels the growth of
tumors. The marketing approval for Genentechs VEGF antagonist, Avastin,
52
and their extensive,
ongoing clinical development plan for Avastin in other cancer indications, may make it more
difficult for us to enroll patients in clinical trials to support the VEGF Trap and to obtain
regulatory approval of the VEGF Trap in these cancer settings. This may delay or impair our
ability to successfully develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap. In addition, even if the VEGF Trap is ever approved for sale for the treatment of
certain cancers, it will be difficult for our drug to compete against Avastin and, if approved by
the FDA, the Onyx/Bayer kinase inhibitor and the Novartis phase 3 tyrosine kinase, because doctors
and patients will have significant experience using these medicines. In addition, an oral
medication may be considerably less expensive for patients than a biologic medication, providing a
competitive advantage to companies that market such products.
The market for eye diseases is also very competitive. Eyetech Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer are
marketing an approved VEGF inhibitor for age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). Novartis and
Genentech are collaborating on the development of a VEGF antibody fragment for the treatment of wet
AMD that is in phase 3 development. In July 2005, Genentech announced positive results from its
phase 3 clinical trial of this VEGF inhibitor in patients with wet AMD. In addition, it has been
reported that ophthalmologists are using a third-party reformulated version of Genentechs approved
VEGF antagonist, Avastin® (a registered trademark of Genentech) with success for the treatment of
wet AMD. The marketing approval of the Eyetech/Pfizer VEGF inhibitor and the potential off-label
use of Avastin and approval of the Novartis/Genentech VEGF antibody fragment make it more difficult
for us to successfully develop the VEGF Trap in eye diseases. Even if the VEGF Trap is ever
approved for sale for the treatment of eye diseases, it will be difficult for our drug to compete
against the Eyetech/Pfizer drug and, if approved by the FDA, the Novartis/Genentech phase 3 VEGF
inhibitor, because doctors and patients will have significant experience using these medicines.
Moreover, the relatively low cost of therapy with Avastin in patients with wet AMD presents a
further competitive challenge in this indication.
The availability of highly effective FDA approved TNF-antagonists such as Enbrel® (a
registered trademark of Amgen), Remicade® (a registered trademark of Centocor), and Humira® (a
registered trademark of Abbott Laboratories), and the IL-1 receptor antagonist Kineret® (a
registered trademark of Amgen), and other marketed therapies makes it more difficult to
successfully develop and commercialize the IL-1 Trap. This is one of the reasons we discontinued
the development of the IL-1 Trap in adult rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, even if the IL-1 Trap
is ever approved for sale, it will be difficult for our drug to compete against these FDA approved
TNF-antagonists in indications where both are useful because doctors and patients will have
significant experience using these effective medicines. Moreover, in such indications these
approved therapeutics may offer competitive advantages over the IL-1 Trap, such as requiring fewer
injections.
There are both small molecules and antibodies in development by third parties that are
designed to block the synthesis of interleukin-1 or inhibit the signaling of interleukin-1. For
example, Novartis is developing an antibody to interleukin-1 and Amgen is developing an antibody to
the interleukin-1 receptor. These drug candidates could offer competitive advantages over the
IL-1Trap. The successful development of these competing molecules could delay or impair our
ability to successfully develop and commercialize the IL-1 Trap. For example, we may find it
difficult to enroll patients in clinical trials for the IL-1 Trap if the companies
53
developing these
competing interleukin-1 inhibitors commence clinical trials in the same indications.
We are developing the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of a spectrum of rare diseases associated
with mutations in the CIAS-1 gene. These rare genetic disorders affect a small group of people,
estimated to
be between several hundred and a few thousand. There may be too few patients with these
genetic disorders to profitably commercialize the IL-1 Trap in this indication.
The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend on obtaining coverage and
reimbursement for use of these products from third-party payers.
Sales of biopharmaceutical products largely depend on the reimbursement of patients medical
expenses by government health care programs and private health insurers. Without the financial
support of the governments or third-party payers, the market for any biopharmaceutical product will
be limited. These third-party payers increasingly challenge the price and examine the
cost-effectiveness of products and services. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement
status of any new therapeutic, particularly if there exist lower-cost standards of care.
Third-party payers may not reimburse sales of our products, which would harm our business.
Risk Related to Employees
We are dependent on our key personnel and if we cannot recruit and retain leaders in our research,
development, manufacturing, and commercial organizations, our business will be harmed.
We are highly dependent on our executive officers. If we are not able to retain any of these
persons or our Chairman, our business may suffer. In particular, we depend on the services of Roy
Vagelos, M.D., the Chairman of our Board of Directors, Leonard Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., our
President and Chief Executive Officer, George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D., our Executive Vice
President, Chief Scientific Officer and President, Regeneron Research Laboratories, Murray A.
Goldberg, our Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,
and Assistant Secretary, Neil Stahl, Ph.D., our Senior Vice President, Preclinical Development and
Biomolecular Science, and Randall G. Rupp, Ph.D., our Senior Vice President, Manufacturing
Operations. There is intense competition in the biotechnology industry for qualified scientists and
managerial personnel in the development, manufacture, and commercialization of drugs. We may not be
able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for developing our
business.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is extremely volatile.
There has been significant volatility in our stock price and generally in the market prices of
biotechnology companies securities. Various factors and events may have a significant impact on
the market price of our common stock. These factors include, by way of example:
54
|
|
|
progress, delays, or adverse results in clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
announcement of technological innovations or product candidates by us or competitors; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
|
public concern as to the safety or effectiveness of our product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
developments in our relationship with collaborative partners; |
|
|
|
|
developments in the biotechnology industry or in government regulation of healthcare; |
|
|
|
|
large sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors, or significant
shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
arrivals and departures of key personnel; and |
|
|
|
|
general market conditions. |
The trading price of our common stock has been, and could continue to be, subject to wide
fluctuations in response to these and other factors, including the sale or attempted sale of a
large amount of our common stock in the market. Broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect
the market price of our common stock.
Future sales of our common stock by our significant shareholders or us may depress our stock price
and impair our ability to raise funds in new share offerings.
A small number of our shareholders beneficially own a substantial amount of our common stock.
As of September 30, 2005, our eight largest shareholders, which
include sanofi-aventis and Novartis, beneficially owned 60.1% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock, assuming, in the
case of Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D. Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer, and P. Roy Vagelos, M.D.,
our Chairman, the conversion of their Class A Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of all
options held by them which are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2005. As of that date,
Novartis owned 7,527,050 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 14.0% of the shares of
Common Stock then outstanding. These shares owned by Novartis are eligible to be sold pursuant to
Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, without registration, without regard to
the volume, manner-of-sale, or other limitations set forth in Rule 144 under such Act, and without
any contractual restrictions on sale. As of September 30, 2005, sanofi-aventis owned
2,799,552 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 5.2% of the shares of Common Stock
then outstanding. Under our stock purchase agreement with sanofi-aventis, through
September 5, 2006 sanofi-aventis may sell no more than 250,000 of these shares in any
calendar quarter. After September 5, 2006, sanofi-aventis may sell no more than 500,000
shares in any calendar quarter. If Novartis or sanofi-aventis, or our other significant
shareholders or we, sell substantial amounts of our Common Stock in the public market, or the
perception that such sales may occur exists, the market price of our Common Stock could fall. Sales
of Common Stock by our significant shareholders, including sanofi-aventis and Novartis,
also might make it more difficult for us to raise funds by selling equity or equity-related
securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
55
Our existing shareholders may be able to exert significant influence over matters requiring
shareholder approval.
Holders of Class A Stock, who are generally the shareholders who purchased their stock from us
before our initial public offering, are entitled to ten votes per share, while holders of Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share. As of September 30, 2005, holders of Class A Stock held
4.2% of all shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock then outstanding, and had 30.4% of the
combined voting power of all of Common Stock and Class A Stock then outstanding. These
shareholders, if acting together, would be in a position to significantly influence the election of
our directors and to effect or prevent certain corporate transactions that require majority or
supermajority approval of the combined classes, including mergers and other business combinations.
This may result in our company taking corporate actions that you may not consider to be in your
best interest and may affect the price of our Common Stock. As of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
our current officers and directors beneficially owned 13.8% of our outstanding shares of
Common Stock, assuming conversion of their Class A Stock into Common Stock and the exercise
of all options held by such persons which are exercisable within 60 days of September 30,
2005, and 34.6% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and
Class A Stock, assuming the exercise of all options held by such persons which are
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2005; and |
|
|
|
|
our eight largest shareholders beneficially owned 60.1% of our outstanding shares of
Common Stock assuming, in the case of Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief
Executive Officer, and P. Roy Vagelos, M.D., our Chairman, the conversion of their Class A
Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of all options held by them which are exercisable
within 60 days of September 30, 2005. In addition, these eight shareholders held 62.9% of
the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock,
assuming the exercise of all options held by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman
which are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2005. |
The anti-takeover effects of provisions of our charter, by-laws, and rights agreement, and of New
York corporate law, could deter, delay, or prevent an acquisition or other change in control of
us and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our by-laws, our rights agreement and
the New York Business Corporation Law contain various provisions that could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change in control of our company or our management that shareholders may
consider favorable or beneficial. Some of these provisions could discourage proxy contests and make
it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors and take other corporate
actions. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock. These provisions include:
|
|
|
authorization to issue blank check preferred stock, which is preferred stock that can
be created and issued by the board of directors without prior shareholder approval, with
rights senior to those of our common shareholders; |
56
|
|
|
a staggered board of directors, so that it would take three successive annual meetings
to replace all of our directors; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that removal of directors may only be effected for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of at least eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote for directors, as well as a requirement that any vacancy on the board of directors may
be filled only by the remaining directors; |
|
|
|
|
any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of shareholders may be taken
without a meeting, only if, prior to such action, all of our shareholders consent, the
effect of which is to require that shareholder action may only be taken at a duly convened
meeting; |
|
|
|
|
any shareholder seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders must
provide timely notice of this intention in writing and meet various other requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
under the New York Business Corporation Law, a plan of merger or consolidation of the
Company must be approved by two-thirds of the votes of all outstanding shares entitled to
vote thereon. See the risk factor immediately above captioned Our existing shareholders
may be able to exert significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval. |
We have a shareholder rights plan which could make it more difficult for a third party to
acquire us without the support of our board of directors and principal shareholders. In addition,
many of our stock options issued under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan may become fully vested in
connection with a change in control of the Company, as defined in the plan.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates
primarily from our investment of available cash balances in investment grade corporate and U.S.
government securities. We do not believe we are materially exposed to changes in interest rates.
Under our current policies we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to
interest rate changes. We estimated that a one percent change in interest rates would result in an
approximately $0.8 million and $1.8 million change in the fair market value of our investment
portfolio at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that, as of the
end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
applicable rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is accumulated
57
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September
30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In May 2003, securities class action lawsuits were commenced against Regeneron and certain of
the Companys officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York. A consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in October 2003. The
complaint, which purports to be brought on behalf of a class consisting of investors in the
Companys publicly traded securities between March 28, 2000 and March 30, 2003, alleges that the
defendants misstated or omitted material information concerning the safety and efficacy of AXOKINE,
in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder.
On August 2, 2005, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement settling all claims against the Company in this lawsuit. The settlement requires no
payment by the Company or any of the individual defendants named in the lawsuit. The Companys
primary insurance carrier agreed to make the required payment under the settlement, which is in an
immaterial amount to the Company. The settlement includes no admission of wrongdoing by the
Company or any of the individual defendants. The settlement must be finally approved by the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York following notice and hearing.
Separately, the plaintiffs and the individual defendants named in the lawsuit entered into a
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, dismissing all claims against the individuals. This voluntary
dismissal shall automatically become a dismissal with prejudice, without costs, upon the court
entering an order and final judgment approving the settlement.
We cannot assure investors that the settlement of the lawsuit will be approved by the court
following notice and hearing. If the settlement is not approved by the court, the lawsuit would
continue.
From time to time, we are a party to other legal proceedings in the course of our business.
We do not expect any such other current legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our
business or financial condition.
58
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
12.1
|
|
Statement re: computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges. |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934. |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934. |
|
32
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
59
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and |
|
|
Assistant Secretary |
60
EX-12.1
Exhibit 12.1
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income (loss) from equity investee |
|
($ |
17,077 |
) |
|
($ |
75,178 |
) |
|
($ |
124,350 |
) |
|
($ |
107,395 |
) |
|
$ |
41,565 |
|
|
($ |
65,781 |
) |
Fixed charges |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
13,685 |
|
|
|
14,108 |
|
|
|
14,060 |
|
|
|
10,260 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings |
|
($ |
15,768 |
) |
|
($ |
71,290 |
) |
|
($ |
110,887 |
) |
|
($ |
93,530 |
) |
|
$ |
55,703 |
|
|
($ |
55,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
2,657 |
|
|
$ |
11,859 |
|
|
$ |
11,932 |
|
|
$ |
12,175 |
|
|
$ |
9,035 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed interest component of rental charges |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
$ |
3,888 |
|
|
$ |
13,685 |
|
|
$ |
14,108 |
|
|
$ |
14,060 |
|
|
$ |
10,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Due to the registrants losses for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the ratio coverage was
less than 1:1. To achieve a coverage ration of 1:1, the registrant must generate additional earnings of the amounts shown in the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
Coverage deficiency |
|
$ |
17,077 |
|
|
$ |
75,178 |
|
|
$ |
124,572 |
|
|
$ |
107,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,723 |
|
EX-31.1:
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of CEO Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Leonard S. Schleifer, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2005 |
/s/ Leonard S. Schleifer
|
|
|
Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D. |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
EX-31.2:
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of CFO Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Murray A. Goldberg, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2005 |
/s/ Murray A. Goldberg
|
|
|
Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance &
Administration, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary |
|
EX-32
Exhibit 32
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Murray A. Goldberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Leonard S. Schleifer |
|
|
Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
November 4, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
November 4, 2005 |
|
|