10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-19034
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
13-3444607 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
777 Old Saw Mill River Road
Tarrytown, New York
|
|
10591-6707 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(914) 347-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as
of July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
Class of Common Stock |
|
Number of Shares |
Class A Stock, $0.001 par value
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
2,296,928
54,674,613 |
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Table of Contents
June 30, 2006
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 2006 AND DECEMBER 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
114,960 |
|
|
$ |
184,508 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
158,616 |
|
|
|
114,037 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
12,141 |
|
|
|
36,521 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
291,056 |
|
|
|
341,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
30,507 |
|
|
|
18,109 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization |
|
|
53,854 |
|
|
|
60,535 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
378,332 |
|
|
$ |
423,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
16,466 |
|
|
$ |
23,337 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
|
15,042 |
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
31,508 |
|
|
|
40,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
63,057 |
|
|
|
69,142 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
294,565 |
|
|
|
309,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
Stock, convertible, $.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
shares issued and outstanding - 2,296,928 in 2006 and 2,347,073 in 2005 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Common
Stock, $.001 par value; 160,000,000 shares authorized;
shares issued and outstanding - 54,669,695 in 2006 and 54,092,268 in 2005 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
713,419 |
|
|
|
700,011 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(629,236 |
) |
|
|
(585,280 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
83,767 |
|
|
|
114,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
378,332 |
|
|
$ |
423,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract research and development |
|
$ |
14,991 |
|
|
$ |
13,545 |
|
|
$ |
29,578 |
|
|
$ |
27,047 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
|
16,366 |
|
|
|
37,477 |
|
|
|
32,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
34,398 |
|
|
|
40,642 |
|
|
|
66,482 |
|
|
|
76,554 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
12,245 |
|
|
|
12,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,507 |
|
|
|
48,533 |
|
|
|
83,389 |
|
|
|
93,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(24,249 |
) |
|
|
(32,167 |
) |
|
|
(45,912 |
) |
|
|
(60,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contract income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,640 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
|
4,769 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
(6,022 |
) |
|
|
(6,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
29,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
|
|
(23,576 |
) |
|
|
(26,999 |
) |
|
|
(44,769 |
) |
|
|
(31,122 |
) |
Cumulative effect of adopting Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R (SFAS 123R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(23,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share amounts, basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
|
|
56,915 |
|
|
|
55,917 |
|
|
|
56,821 |
|
|
|
55,866 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Class A Stock |
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Unearned |
|
Accumulated |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Compensation |
|
Deficit |
|
Loss |
|
Equity |
|
Loss |
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
54,092 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
700,011 |
|
|
$ |
(315 |
) |
|
$ |
(585,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(470 |
) |
|
$ |
114,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
exercise of stock options, net of shares tendered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with
Company 401(k) Savings Plan contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class A Stock to Common Stock |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted Common Stock under
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reduce unearned compensation
upon adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,956 |
) |
Change in net unrealized loss on
marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
54,670 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
713,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(629,236 |
) |
|
$ |
(473 |
) |
|
$ |
83,767 |
|
|
$ |
(43,959 |
) |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(43,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
7,689 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
8,779 |
|
|
|
11,703 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
24,380 |
|
|
|
26,272 |
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
Decrease in inventory |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Decrease in deferred revenue |
|
|
(8,063 |
) |
|
|
(6,848 |
) |
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses,
and other liabilities |
|
|
(5,118 |
) |
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
28,559 |
|
|
|
35,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(15,397 |
) |
|
|
4,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(152,660 |
) |
|
|
(60,392 |
) |
Sales or maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
95,292 |
|
|
|
107,680 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
(2,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(58,354 |
) |
|
|
44,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of stock |
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
Other |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(69,548 |
) |
|
|
49,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
184,508 |
|
|
|
95,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
114,960 |
|
|
$ |
145,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
6
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Interim Financial Statements
The interim Condensed Financial Statements of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Regeneron or
the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and disclosures necessary for
a presentation of the Companys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the
opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows for such periods. The results of operations for any interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The December 31, 2005
Condensed Balance Sheet data were derived from audited financial statements, but do not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
2. Per Share Data
The Companys basic and diluted net loss per share amounts have been computed by dividing net
loss by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock outstanding. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company reported net losses and,
therefore, no common stock equivalents were included in the computation of diluted net loss per
share for these periods, since such inclusion would have been antidilutive. The calculations of
basic and diluted net loss per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net loss (Numerator) |
|
$ |
(23,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares, in thousands
(Denominator) |
|
|
56,915 |
|
|
|
55,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
7
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net loss (Numerator) |
|
$ |
(43,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares, in thousands
(Denominator) |
|
|
56,821 |
|
|
|
55,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of restricted stock awards, and
conversion of convertible debt, which have been excluded from the June 30, 2006 and 2005 diluted
per share amounts because their effect would have been antidilutive, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
14,181 |
|
|
|
13,295 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
14.32 |
|
|
$ |
14.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
Conversion price |
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
14,291 |
|
|
|
13,385 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
14.29 |
|
|
$ |
14.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number, in thousands |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
Conversion price |
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
|
$ |
30.25 |
|
8
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
3. Stock-based Employee Compensation
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 123 and 123R
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. (SFAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the modified prospective
method as described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure. As a result, in 2005, the Company recognized compensation expense, in an amount equal
to the fair value of share-based payments (including stock option awards) on their date of grant,
over the vesting period of the awards using graded vesting, which is an accelerated expense
recognition method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense for the Company is
recognized for (a) all share based payments granted on or after January 1, 2005 and (b) all awards
granted to employees prior to January 1, 2005 that were unvested on that date.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of SFAS 123. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, and
requires the recognition of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the
share-based payment (including stock options and restricted stock) issued to employees. SFAS 123R
requires companies to estimate the number of awards that are expected to be forfeited at the time
of grant and to revise this estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures
differ from those estimates. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company recognized the effect
of forfeitures in stock-based compensation cost in the period when they occurred, in accordance
with SFAS 123. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006, the Company was required to
record a cumulative effect adjustment to reflect the effect of estimated forfeitures related to
outstanding awards that are not expected to vest as of the SFAS 123R adoption date. This
adjustment reduced the Companys loss by $813 and is included in the Companys operating results
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as a cumulative-effect adjustment of a change in accounting
principle. Exclusive of the cumulative-effect adjustment, the effect of the change from applying
the provisions of SFAS 123 to applying the provisions of SFAS 123R on the Companys loss from
operations, net loss, and net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was
not significant, and there was no impact to the Companys cash flows for these respective periods.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2000 Incentive Plan), as
amended, provides for the issuance of up to 18,500,000 shares of Common Stock in respect of awards.
In addition, certain shares of Common Stock previously approved by shareholders for issuance under
the Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
9
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Inc. 1990 Long-Term Incentive Plan (1990 Incentive Plan) that are not issued under the 1990
Incentive Plan, may be issued as awards under the 2000 Incentive Plan. The 1990 Incentive Plan, as
amended, provided for a maximum of 6,900,000 shares of Common Stock in respect of awards. The 1990
Incentive Plan has expired and there will be no future awards from the 1990 Incentive Plan. The
Company has issued Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) and Nonqualified Stock Options, and shares of
Restricted Stock from the 1990 and 2000 Incentive Plans. The terms of the awards are determined by
the Compensation Committee of the board of directors; however, in the case of an ISO, the option
exercise price will not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date
the ISO is granted and no ISO is exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant. As of
June 30, 2006, there were 6,495,452 shares available for future grants under the 2000 Incentive
Plan.
a. Stock Options
At June 30, 2006, there were 14,150,178 stock options outstanding with exercise prices ranging
from $4.83 to $51.56. Options granted to employees generally vest annually on a pro rata basis
over a four to five year period beginning one year from the date of grant. Certain
performance-based options granted to the Companys executive vice president and senior vice
presidents in January 2005 vest if both (i) the Companys products have achieved defined sales
targets and (ii) the option recipient has remained employed by the Company for at least three years
from the date of grant. Options granted to members of the Companys board of directors vest
annually on a pro rata basis over three years beginning one year from the date of grant. A summary
of the Companys stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value (in |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
thousands) |
|
Stock options
outstanding at
January 1, 2006 |
|
|
14,719,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options granted |
|
|
206,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
(438,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options forfeited |
|
|
(201,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options expired |
|
|
(136,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
outstanding at June
30, 2006 |
|
|
14,150,178 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.32 |
|
|
$ |
28,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options vested
and exercisable |
|
|
7,193,872 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.70 |
|
|
$ |
12,185 |
|
10
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the first six months of 2006 and 2005
was $2,863 and $200, respectively. The intrinsic value represents the amount by which the market
price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of an option.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, non-cash stock-based employee compensation
expense related to stock option awards (Stock Option Expense) totaled $4,610 and $5,398,
respectively, of which $4,585 and $5,348 was recognized in operating expenses and $25 and $50 was
capitalized into inventory, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Stock
Option Expense totaled $8,541 and $10,939, respectively, of which $8,481 and $10,727 was recognized
in operating expenses and $60 and $212 was capitalized into inventory, respectively. As of June
30, 2006, there was $23,243 of stock-based compensation cost related to outstanding nonvested stock
options, net of estimated forfeitures, which had not yet been recognized in operating expenses.
The Company expects to recognize this compensation cost over a weighted-average period of 1.7
years. In addition, there are 723,092 options which are unvested as of June 30, 2006 and would
become vested upon the attainment of certain performance and service conditions. Potential
compensation cost, measured on the grant date, related to these performance options totals $2,688
and will begin to be recognized only if, and when, these options performance condition becomes
probable of attainment.
Fair Value Assumptions:
The fair value of each option granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Using this
model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of the
Companys Common Stock price, (ii) the periods of time over which employees and board directors are
expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected lives), (iii) expected dividend yield on
the Companys Common Stock, and (iv) risk-free interest rates, which are based on quoted U.S.
Treasury rates for securities with maturities approximating the options expected lives. Expected
volatility has been estimated based on actual movements in the Companys stock price over the most
recent historical periods equivalent to the options expected lives. Expected lives are
principally
based on the Companys limited historical exercise experience with option grants with similar
exercise prices. The expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has never paid dividends and
does not currently anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. The weighted-average fair
value of the options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8.23 and
$4.04 per option, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $10.28 and $5.81 per option, respectively. The
following table summarizes the weighted average values of the assumptions used in computing the
fair value of option grants.
11
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
5.2 years |
|
5.0 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
6.8 years |
|
6.2 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
b. Restricted Stock
A summary of the Companys activity related to Restricted Stock awards for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Restricted stock outstanding as of January
1, 2006 |
|
|
95,188 |
|
|
$ |
11.16 |
|
Restricted stock released |
|
|
(93,485 |
) |
|
$ |
11.18 |
|
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
(1,703 |
) |
|
$ |
9.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock outstanding as of June 30,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company recorded unearned
compensation in Stockholders Equity related to these Restricted Stock awards. The amount was
based on the fair market value of shares of the Companys Common Stock on the date of grant and is
expensed, on a pro rata basis, over the period that the restrictions lapse, which is approximately
two years for grants issued in 2003 and 18 months for grants issued in 2004. No Restricted Stock
awards were granted in 2005 or during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, unearned compensation was included as a separate component of Stockholders Equity.
Effective January 1, 2006, unearned compensation was combined with additional paid-in capital in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized compensation expense
related to Restricted Stock awards of $115 and $474, respectively. For the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized
12
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
compensation expense related to Restricted Stock awards of $299 and $976, respectively. As
of June 30, 2006, there were no unvested shares of restricted stock outstanding and all
compensation expense related to these awards had been recognized.
4. Statement of Cash Flows
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are
$216 and $234, respectively, of accrued capital expenditures. Included in accounts payable and
accrued expenses at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are $1,393 and $550, respectively, of
accrued capital expenditures.
Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are $1,884 and
$632, respectively, of accrued Company 401(k) Savings Plan contribution expense. In the first
quarter of 2006 and 2005, the Company contributed 120,960 and 90,385 shares, respectively, of
Common Stock to the 401(k) Savings Plan in satisfaction of these obligations.
Included in marketable securities at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are $840 and $1,228,
respectively, of accrued interest income. Included in marketable securities at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004 are $2,562 and $2,601, respectively, of accrued interest income.
5. Severance Costs
In September 2005, the Company announced plans to reduce its workforce by approximately 165
employees in connection with narrowing the focus of the Companys research and development efforts,
substantial improvements in manufacturing productivity, the June 2005 expiration of the Companys
collaboration with The Procter & Gamble Company, and the expected completion of contract
manufacturing for Merck & Co., Inc. in late 2006. The majority of the headcount reduction occurred
in the fourth quarter of 2005, with the remainder planned for 2006 following the completion of the
Companys contract manufacturing activities for Merck.
Costs associated with the workforce reduction are comprised principally of severance payments
and related payroll taxes, employee benefits, and outplacement services. Termination costs related
to 2005 workforce reductions were expensed in the fourth quarter of 2005. Estimated termination
costs associated with the planned workforce
reduction in 2006 were measured in October 2005 and are being expensed ratably over the
expected service period of the affected employees in accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The Company
13
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
estimates that total costs associated with the 2005 and planned 2006 workforce reductions will
approximate $2.6 million, including $0.2 million of non-cash expenses in 2005.
Severance costs associated with the workforce reduction plan that were charged to expense
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
liability at |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs paid |
|
|
liability at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
charged to |
|
|
or settled in |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
expense |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Employee severance,
payroll taxes, and
benefits |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
Other severance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
liability at |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs paid |
|
|
liability at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
charged to |
|
|
or settled in |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
expense |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Employee severance,
payroll taxes, and
benefits |
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
Other severance costs |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These severance costs are included in the Companys Statement of Operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
development |
|
|
Employee severance, payroll taxes, and benefits |
|
$ |
197 |
|
Other severance costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & |
|
|
General & |
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
development |
|
|
administrative |
|
Employee severance, payroll taxes, and
benefits |
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Other severance costs |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For segment reporting purposes (see Note 10), all severance-related expenses are included in the
Research & Development segment.
6. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Receivable from the sanofi-aventis Group |
|
$ |
11,773 |
|
|
$ |
36,412 |
|
Receivable from Merck & Co., Inc. |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,141 |
|
|
$ |
36,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in process, and finished products associated with
the production of an intermediate for a Merck & Co., Inc. pediatric vaccine under a long-term
manufacturing agreement which will expire in October 2006.
Inventories as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
2,128 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,128 |
|
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share
data)
8 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,840 |
|
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
10,713 |
|
Accrued clinical trial expense |
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
Accrued expenses, other |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
Interest payable on convertible notes |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,466 |
|
|
$ |
23,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss represents the change in net assets of a business enterprise during a
period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive
loss of the Company includes net loss adjusted for the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on
marketable securities. The net effect of income taxes on comprehensive loss is immaterial. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the components of comprehensive loss are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(23,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,999 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on
marketable securities |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(23,678 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(43,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,122 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on
marketable securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(43,959 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Segment Information
|
|
The Companys operations are managed in two business segments: research and development, and
contract manufacturing. |
16
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Research and development: Includes all activities related to the discovery of pharmaceutical
products for the treatment of serious medical conditions, and the development and commercialization
of these discoveries. Also includes revenues and expenses related to (i) the development of
manufacturing processes prior to commencing commercial production of a product under contract
manufacturing arrangements, and (ii) the supply of research materials based on Regeneron-developed
proprietary technology.
Contract manufacturing: Includes all revenues and expenses related to the commercial production of
products under contract manufacturing arrangements. The Company produces an intermediate for a
Merck & Co., Inc. pediatric vaccine under a long-term manufacturing agreement which will expire in
October 2006.
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
14,991 |
|
|
$ |
4,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,258 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
Non-cash
compensation
expense |
|
|
4,603 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(25,706 |
) |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
673 |
(2) |
|
|
(23,576 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
13,545 |
|
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,366 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
|
3,831 |
|
Non-cash
compensation expense |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,822 |
|
Other contract income |
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,640 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(27,673 |
) |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
(472 |
)(2) |
|
|
(26,999 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
17
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Unless otherwise noted, dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
29,578 |
|
|
$ |
7,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,477 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
|
7,488 |
|
Non-cash
compensation
expense |
|
|
8,587 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(813 |
)(3) |
|
|
7,966 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(49,149 |
) |
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
(2) |
|
|
(43,956 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
310,209 |
(4) |
|
|
378,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Research & |
|
Contract |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
27,047 |
|
|
$ |
5,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,575 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
|
7,689 |
|
Non-cash
compensation expense |
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,703 |
|
Other contract income |
|
|
30,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,640 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(31,229 |
) |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
(1,255 |
)(2) |
|
|
(31,122 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
81,936 |
|
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
359,006 |
(4) |
|
|
446,948 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Depreciation and amortization related to contract manufacturing is capitalized into
inventory and included in contract manufacturing expense when the product is shipped. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents investment income, net of interest expense related primarily to
convertible notes issued in October 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, also
includes the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123R (see Note 3). |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123R (see Note 3). |
|
(4) |
|
Includes cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, prepaid expenses and
other current assets, and other assets. |
11. Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings in the course of the Companys
business. The Company does not expect any such current legal proceedings to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys business or financial condition.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties relating to future events and the future financial performance of Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and actual events or results may differ materially. These statements concern,
among other things, the possible success and therapeutic applications of our product candidates and
research programs, the timing and nature of the clinical and research programs now underway or
planned, and the future sources and uses of capital and our financial needs. These statements are
made by us based on managements current beliefs and judgment. In evaluating such statements,
stockholders and potential investors should specifically consider the various factors identified
under the caption Risk Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those
indicated by such forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise, except as required by law.
Overview
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, and
intends to commercialize pharmaceutical products for the treatment of serious medical conditions.
We are currently focused on three development programs: VEGF Trap in oncology, VEGF Trap eye
formulation (VEGF Trap-Eye) in eye diseases using intraocular delivery, and IL-1 Trap in various
inflammatory indications. The VEGF Trap is being developed in oncology in collaboration with the
sanofi-aventis Group. Our preclinical research programs are in the areas of oncology and
angiogenesis, ophthalmology, metabolic and related diseases, muscle diseases and disorders,
inflammation and immune diseases, bone and cartilage, pain, and cardiovascular diseases. We expect
that our next generation of product candidates will be based on our proprietary technologies for
developing human monoclonal antibodies. Developing and commercializing new medicines entails
significant risk and expense. Since inception we have not generated any sales or profits from the
commercialization of any of our product candidates.
Our core business strategy is to maintain a strong foundation in basic scientific research and
discovery-enabling technology and combine that foundation with our manufacturing and clinical
development capabilities to build a successful, integrated biopharmaceutical company. Our efforts
have yielded a diverse pipeline of product candidates that we believe has the potential to address
a variety of serious medical conditions. We believe that our ability to develop product candidates
is enhanced by the application of our technology platforms. Our discovery platforms are designed
to identify specific genes of therapeutic interest for a particular disease or cell type and
validate targets through high-throughput production of mammalian models. Our human monoclonal
antibody (VelocImmune®) and cell line expression technologies may then be utilized to design and
produce new product candidates directed against the disease target. Based on the strength of the
VelocImmune platform, which we believe, in conjunction with our other
proprietary technologies, can accelerate
the development of fully human monoclonal antibodies, we plan to move two new antibody candidates
into clinical trials each year going forward beginning in 2007. We continue to invest in the
development of enabling technologies to assist in our efforts to identify, develop, and
commercialize new product candidates.
19
Clinical Programs:
Below is a summary of the clinical status of our clinical candidates as of June 30, 2006:
1.
VEGF Trap Oncology
The VEGF Trap is a protein-based product candidate designed to bind all forms of Vascular
Endothelial Growth Factor-A (called VEGF-A, also known as Vascular Permeability Factor or VPF) and
the related Placental Growth Factor (called PlGF), and prevent their interaction with cell surface
receptors. VEGF-A (and to a less validated degree, PlGF) is required for the growth of new blood
vessels that are needed for tumors to grow and is a potent regulator of vascular permeability and
leakage.
The VEGF Trap is being developed in cancer indications in collaboration with sanofi-aventis,
as described below. In September 2005, we and sanofi-aventis announced plans to expand our joint
development program, and we have subsequently initiated a broad set of clinical trials in oncology.
In the first half of 2006, we and sanofi-aventis initiated our phase 2 single-agent program
for the VEGF Trap in cancer. Patient enrollment is now underway in studies in advanced ovarian
cancer (AOC), non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma (NSCLA), and AOC patients with symptomatic
malignant ascites (SMA). In 2004, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted
Fast Track designation to the VEGF Trap for the treatment of SMA.
The companies also plan to conduct three phase 3 efficacy/safety trials using the VEGF Trap in
combination with standard chemotherapy regimens, the first of which is planned to begin in late
2006 or early 2007, once the supporting safety and tolerability studies have been completed. The
companies are working to finalize plans with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy
Evaluation Program (CTEP) to conduct at least ten additional cancer trials, several of which are
planned to begin in 2006.
Currently there are five safety and tolerability studies underway for the VEGF Trap in
combination with standard chemotherapy regimens designed to support subsequent phase 3 clinical
trials in a variety of cancer types. At the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical
Oncology (ASCO) in May 2006, the companies reported abstracts summarizing information from two of
these studies. The first study is evaluating the VEGF Trap plus oxaliplatin, 5-flourouracil, and
leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in a phase 1 trial of patients with advanced solid tumors. The second study
is evaluating the VEGF Trap plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (LV5FU2-CPT11) in a
phase 1 trial of patients with advanced solid tumors. In both trials, patients have been treated
in combination with chemotherapy in doses ranging up to 4.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of the
VEGF Trap. The abstracts, published in the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, reported
that the VEGF Trap could be safely combined with either FOLFOX4 or LV5FU2-CPT11 at the dose levels
studied. The maximum tolerated doses in these studies have not yet been reached, and dose
escalation is continuing.
20
Cancer is a heterogeneous set of diseases and one of the leading causes of death in the
developed world. A mutation in any one of dozens of normal genes can eventually result in a cell
becoming cancerous; however, a common feature of cancer cells is that they need to obtain nutrients
and remove waste products, just as normal cells do. The vascular system normally supplies
nutrients to and removes waste from normal tissues. Cancer cells can use the vascular system
either by taking over preexisting blood vessels or by promoting the growth of new blood vessels (a
process known as angiogenesis). VEGF is secreted by many tumors to stimulate the growth of new
blood vessels to supply nutrients and oxygen to the tumor. VEGF blockers have been shown to
inhibit new vessel growth; and, in some cases, can cause regression of existing tumor vasculature.
Countering the effects of VEGF, thereby blocking the blood supply to tumors, has demonstrated
therapeutic benefits in clinical trials. This approach of inhibiting angiogenesis as a mechanism of
action for an oncology medicine was validated in February 2004, when the FDA approved Genentech,
Inc.s VEGF inhibitor, Avastin®. Avastin is an antibody product designed to inhibit VEGF and
interfere with the blood supply to tumors.
In September 2003, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Aventis Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (predecessor to sanofi-aventis U.S.) to collaborate on the development and commercialization
of the VEGF Trap in all countries other than Japan, where we retained the exclusive right to
develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap. In January 2005, we and sanofi-aventis amended the
collaboration agreement to exclude from the scope of the collaboration the development and
commercialization of the VEGF Trap for intraocular delivery to the eye. In December 2005, we and
sanofi-aventis amended our collaboration agreement to expand the territory in which the companies
are collaborating on the development of the VEGF Trap to include Japan. Under the collaboration
agreement, as amended, we and sanofi-aventis will share co-promotion rights and profits on sales,
if any, of the VEGF Trap outside of Japan for disease indications included in our collaboration.
In Japan, we are entitled to a royalty of approximately 35% on annual sales of the VEGF Trap,
subject to certain potential adjustments. We may also receive up to $400.0 million in milestone
payments upon receipt of specified marketing approvals. This total includes up to $360.0 million
in milestone payments related to receipt of marketing approvals for up to eight VEGF Trap oncology
and other indications in the United States or the European Union. Another $40.0 million of
milestone payments relate to receipt of marketing approvals for up to five VEGF Trap oncology
indications in Japan.
Under the collaboration agreement, as amended, agreed upon worldwide development expenses
incurred by both companies during the term of the agreement will be funded by sanofi-aventis. If
the collaboration becomes profitable, we will be obligated to reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of
the VEGF Trap development expenses in accordance with a formula based on the amount of development
expenses and our share of the collaboration profits and Japan royalties, or at a faster rate at our
option. (See The sanofi-aventis Group Agreement below.)
2.
VEGF Trap Eye Diseases
We are developing the VEGF Trap-Eye for the treatment of certain eye diseases. This product
candidate has been purified and formulated in concentrations suitable for direct injection into the
eye. We retain the exclusive right to develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap-Eye for the
treatment of eye diseases utilizing local (intravitreal) delivery to the eye. In May 2006, we
21
announced that we had initiated a phase 2 trial of the VEGF Trap-Eye delivered intravitreally in
patients with the neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).
At the May 2006 Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
(ARVO), we reported positive preliminary results from a phase 1 trial of the VEGF Trap-Eye in
patients with wet AMD. A total of 21 patients received a single dose of VEGF Trap-Eye at doses of
0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 milligrams (mg) intravitreally (direct injection into the eye).
Patients were evaluated for six weeks to measure the durability of effects and provide guidance for
dosing regimens to be used in future trials. All dose levels were generally well tolerated, and a
maximum tolerated dose was not reached in the study. In wet AMD, the leakiness of the abnormal
blood vessels in the eye can lead to increased retinal thickness. On average, patients receiving
the VEGF Trap-Eye demonstrated large, rapid, and sustained (at least six weeks) reductions in
retinal thickness. Excess retinal thickness, as determined by ocular coherence tomography (OCT),
is a clinical measure of disease activity in wet AMD. As measured by the OCT reading center
(posterior pole OCT scans), the median excess retinal thickness resulting from the disease process
was 194 microns at baseline. Following a single intravitreal dose of the VEGF Trap-Eye, median
excess retinal thickness was reduced to 60 microns, an improvement that was sustained over a six
week period. As measured by the computerized Fast Macular Scan protocol, the median excess retinal
thickness was 119 microns at baseline, which was reduced to 27 microns at six weeks after the
single dose of the VEGF Trap-Eye.
Of the 20 patients evaluable for efficacy, 95 percent had stabilization or improvement in
visual acuity, defined as £15 letter loss on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study
(ETDRS) eye chart. Patients were also evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the best
acuity a person can achieve with glasses. BCVA for all patients in the study increased by a mean
of 4.8 letters at six weeks. In the two
highest dose groups (2 mg and 4 mg), the mean improvement in BCVA was 13.5 letters, with three
of six patients showing an improvement in BCVA of 15 or more letters.
In the second quarter of 2006, we initiated a 150 patient, 12 week, phase 2 trial of the VEGF
Trap-Eye in wet AMD. The trial is evaluating the safety and biological effect of treatment with
multiple doses of the VEGF Trap-Eye using different doses and different dosing regimens. A phase 3
trial of the VEGF Trap-Eye in wet AMD is planned to begin in early 2007.
Also in the second quarter of 2006, we initiated a small pilot study of the VEGF Trap in
patients with diabetic macular edema.
VEGF-A both stimulates angiogenesis and increases vascular permeability. It has been shown in
preclinical studies to be a major pathogenic factor in both wet AMD and diabetic retinopathy, and
it is believed to be involved in other medical problems affecting the eyes. In clinical trials,
blocking VEGF-A has been shown to be effective in patients with wet AMD, and Macugen® (OSI
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Lucentis (Genentech, Inc.) have been approved to treat patients with
this condition.
Wet AMD and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are two of the leading causes of adult blindness in the
developed world. In both conditions, severe visual loss is caused by a combination of retinal
22
edema and neovascular proliferation. It is estimated that in the U.S. 6% of individuals aged 65-74
and 20% of those older than 75 are affected with wet AMD. DR is a major complication of diabetes
mellitus that can lead to significant vision impairment. DR is characterized, in part, by vascular
leakage, which results in the collection of fluid in the retina. When the macula, the central area
of the retina that is responsible for fine visual acuity, is involved, loss of visual acuity
occurs. This is referred to as diabetic macular edema (DME). DME is the most prevalent cause of
moderate visual loss in patients with diabetes.
3.
IL-1 Trap Inflammatory Diseases
The IL-1 Trap is a protein-based product candidate designed to bind the interleukin-1 (called
IL-1) cytokine and prevent its interaction with cell surface receptors.
We are evaluating the IL-1 Trap in a number of diseases and disorders where IL-1 may play an
important role, including a spectrum of rare diseases called CIAS1-Associated Periodic Syndrome
(CAPS) and diseases associated with inflammation. These include Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic
Arthritis (SJIA) and certain inflammatory vascular diseases.
In April 2006, we completed enrollment of the pivotal study of the IL-1 Trap in patients with
CAPS. Patients in the trial are receiving a 160 mg dose of the IL-1 Trap once a week through
subcutaneous self-administration. The six-month, placebo-controlled, double-blind, efficacy phase
of the study is expected to be completed and preliminary data available by the end of 2006. This
phase will be followed by a six-month open-label extension phase. We plan to file a Biologics
License Application (BLA) for the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of CAPS in early 2007. In addition, Regeneron has ongoing
proof-of-concept studies in other indications, such as SJIA. The FDA has granted Orphan Drug and
Fast Track designations to the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of CAPS. In April 2005, the FDA also
granted an Orphan Drug designation to the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of SJIA.
An IL-1 receptor antagonist, Kineret® (Amgen Inc.), has been approved by the FDA for the
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It has been publicly reported that in small trials Kineret
appears to reduce the symptoms in CAPS patients and SJIA patients, which supports the role of IL-1
in these diseases. CAPS includes rare genetic disorders, such as Familial Cold Auto-Inflammatory
Syndrome (FCAS), Muckle Wells Syndrome, and Neonatal Onset Multisystem Inflammatory Disorder
(NOMID), which affect a small group of people. Patients with these disorders develop fever, joint
aches, headaches, and rashes. In certain indications, these symptoms can be extremely serious.
There are no currently approved therapies for CAPS. SJIA is a severe inflammatory disorder which
may be debilitating or fatal. It is estimated that there are between 5,000 and 10,000 children
with SJIA in the United States.
Under a March 2003 collaboration agreement with Novartis Pharma AG, we retain the right to
elect to collaborate in the future development and commercialization of a Novartis IL-1 antibody,
which is in clinical development. Following completion of phase 2 development and submission to us
of a written report on the Novartis IL-1 antibody, we have the right, in consideration for an
opt-in payment, to elect to co-develop and co-commercialize the Novartis
IL-1 antibody in North America. If we elect to exercise this right, we are responsible for
paying 45% of post-election North American development costs for the antibody product. In return,
we
23
are entitled to co-promote the Novartis IL-1 antibody and to receive 45% of net profits on sales
of the antibody product in North America. Under certain circumstances, we are also entitled to
receive royalties on sales of the Novartis IL-1 antibody in Europe.
In addition, under the collaboration agreement, Novartis has the right to elect to collaborate
in the development and commercialization of a second generation IL-1 Trap following completion of
its phase 2 development, should we decide to clinically develop such a second generation product
candidate. Novartis does not have any rights or options with respect to our IL-1 Trap currently in
clinical development.
General
Developing and commercializing new medicines entails significant risk and expense. Since
inception we have not generated any sales or profits from the commercialization of any of our
product candidates and may never receive such revenues. Before revenues from the commercialization
of our product candidates can be realized, we (or our collaborators) must overcome a number of
hurdles which include successfully completing research and development and obtaining regulatory
approval from the FDA and regulatory authorities in other countries. In addition, the
biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and new
developments may render our products and technologies uncompetitive or obsolete.
From inception on January 8, 1988 through June 30, 2006, we had a cumulative loss of $629.2
million. In the absence of revenues from the commercialization of our product candidates or other
sources, the amount, timing, nature, or source of which cannot be predicted, our losses will
continue as we conduct our research and development activities. We expect to incur substantial
losses over the next several years as we continue the clinical development of the IL-1 Trap;
advance new product candidates into clinical development from our existing research programs;
continue our research and development programs; and commercialize product candidates that receive
regulatory approval, if any. Also, our activities may expand over time and require additional
resources, and we expect our operating losses to be substantial over at least the next several
years. Our losses may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and will depend, among other factors, on
the progress of our research and development efforts, the timing of certain expenses, and the
amount and timing of payments that we receive from collaborators.
The planning, execution, and results of our clinical programs are significant factors that can
affect our operating and financial results. In our clinical programs, key events for 2006 and
plans over the next 12 months are as follows:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Candidate |
|
2006 Events to Date |
|
2006-7 Plans |
VEGF Trap
|
|
|
|
Initiated phase 2 studies of the
|
|
|
|
Initiate up to three efficacy/safety |
Oncology
|
|
|
|
VEGF Trap as a single agent in
|
|
|
|
studies of the VEGF Trap in |
|
|
|
|
AOC and NSCLA patients, and
|
|
|
|
combination with standard |
|
|
|
|
in AOC patients with SMA.
|
|
|
|
chemotherapy regimens in |
|
|
|
|
Initiated two safety and
|
|
|
|
different cancer indications |
|
|
|
|
tolerability studies of the VEGF
|
|
|
|
Sponsor with the NCI/CTEP at |
|
|
|
|
Trap in combination with
|
|
|
|
least ten exploratory |
|
|
|
|
standard chemotherapy regimens
|
|
|
|
efficacy/safety studies evaluating |
|
|
|
|
Reported encouraging
|
|
|
|
the VEGF Trap in a variety of |
|
|
|
|
preliminary results of the safety
|
|
|
|
cancer types |
|
|
|
|
and tolerability of intravenous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEGF Trap plus FOLFOX4 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of intravenous VEGF Trap plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LV5FU2-CPT11 in separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phase 1 trials of patients with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
advanced solid tumors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEGF Trap-Eye
|
|
|
|
Reported positive preliminary
|
|
|
|
Report preliminary results of |
|
|
|
|
results from phase 1 trial in wet
|
|
|
|
phase 2 trial in wet AMD utilizing |
|
|
|
|
AMD utilizing intravitreal
|
|
|
|
intravitreal injections |
|
|
|
|
injections in 21 patients up to a
|
|
|
|
Initiate phase 3 trial in wet AMD |
|
|
|
|
top dose of 4 mg
|
|
|
|
utilizing intravitreal injections |
|
|
|
|
Initiated phase 2 trial in wet AMD
|
|
|
|
Explore additional eye disease |
|
|
|
|
utilizing intravitreal injections
|
|
|
|
indications |
|
|
|
|
Initiated phase 1 trial in DME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IL-1 Trap
|
|
|
|
Completed enrollment of pivotal
|
|
|
|
Complete efficacy portion of |
|
|
|
|
trial of IL-1 Trap in CAPS
|
|
|
|
pivotal study in CAPS and, if |
|
|
|
|
Reported positive preliminary
|
|
|
|
results show positive efficacy and |
|
|
|
|
results from ongoing phase 1 trial
|
|
|
|
safety, file Biologics License |
|
|
|
|
in SJIA
|
|
|
|
Application (BLA) with the FDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiate advanced efficacy trial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating the IL-1 Trap for SJIA |
Accounting for Stock-based Employee Compensation
Effective January 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. (SFAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the modified prospective
method as described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and
Disclosure. As a result, in 2005, we recognized compensation expense, in an amount equal to the
fair value of share-based payments (including stock option awards) on their date of grant, over the
vesting period of the awards using graded vesting, which is an accelerated expense recognition
method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense for Regeneron is recognized
for (a) all share based payments granted on or after January 1, 2005 and (b) all awards granted to
employees prior to January 1, 2005 that were unvested on that date.
25
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, which
is a revision of SFAS 123. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, and requires the recognition
of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the share-based payment (including
stock options and restricted stock) issued to employees. SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate
the number of awards that are expected to be forfeited at the time of grant and to revise this
estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognized the effect of forfeitures in stock-based
compensation cost in the period when they occurred, in accordance with SFAS 123. Upon adoption of
SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006, we were required to record a cumulative effect adjustment to
reflect the effect of estimated forfeitures related to outstanding awards that are not expected to
vest as of the SFAS 123R adoption date. This adjustment reduced our loss by $0.8 million and is
included in our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as a cumulative-effect
adjustment of a change in accounting principle. Exclusive of the cumulative-effect adjustment, the
effect of the change from applying the provisions of SFAS 123 to applying the provisions of SFAS
123R on our loss from operations, net loss, and net loss per share for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 was not significant, and there was no impact to our cash flows for these
respective periods.
Non-cash stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock option awards (Stock
Option Expense) totaled $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, which was
recognized in operating expenses, and $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, of
which $5.3 million was recognized in operating expenses and $0.1 million was capitalized into
inventory. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Stock Option Expense totaled $8.6
million and $10.9 million, respectively, of which $8.5 million and $10.7 million was recognized in
operating expenses and $0.1 million and $0.2 million was capitalized into inventory, respectively.
As of June 30, 2006, there was $23.2 million of stock-based compensation cost related to
outstanding nonvested stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, which had not yet been
recognized in operating expenses. We expect to recognize this compensation cost over a
weighted-average period of 1.7 years. In addition, there are 723,092 options which are unvested as
of June 30, 2006 and would become vested upon the attainment of certain performance and service
conditions. Potential compensation cost, measured on the grant date, related to these performance
options totals $2.7 million and will begin to be recognized only if, and when, these options
performance condition becomes probable of attainment.
Assumptions
We use the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of each option granted under the
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Using this model, fair value is
calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of our Common Stock price,
(ii) the periods of time over which employees and Board Directors are expected to hold their
options prior to exercise (expected lives), (iii) expected dividend yield on our Common Stock, and
(iv) risk-free interest rates, which are based on quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with
maturities approximating the options expected lives. Expected volatility has been estimated based
on actual movements in our stock price over the most recent historical periods equivalent to the
options expected lives. Expected lives are principally based on our limited historical exercise
experience with option grants with similar exercise prices. The
26
expected
dividend yield is zero as we have never paid dividends and do not currently anticipate paying
any in the foreseeable future. The following table summarizes the weighted average values of the
assumptions we used in computing the fair value of option grants during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
5.2 years |
|
5.0 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
Expected lives from grant date |
|
6.8 years |
|
6.2 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
|
3.96 |
% |
Changes in any of these estimates may materially affect the fair value of stock options granted and
the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in any period.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Net Loss:
Regeneron reported a net loss of $23.6 million, or $0.41 per share (basic and diluted), for
the second quarter of 2006 compared to a net loss of $27.0 million, or $0.48 per share (basic and
diluted), for the second quarter of 2005.
Revenues:
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
(In millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Contract research & development revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sanofi-aventis Group |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract research &
development revenue |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Contract manufacturing revenue |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
We earn contract research and development revenue from sanofi-aventis in connection with the
companies VEGF Trap collaboration which, as detailed below, consists partly of reimbursement for
research and development expenses and partly of the recognition of
revenue related to a total of $105.0
million of non-refundable, up-front payments received in 2003 and 2006. Non-refundable, up-front
payments are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the period over which we are
obligated to perform services in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition (SAB 104).
Sanofi-aventis Contract Research & Development Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Regeneron expense reimbursement |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
Recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front payments |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanofi-aventis reimbursement of Regeneron VEGF Trap expenses increased in the second
quarter of 2006 from the same period in 2005, primarily due to higher costs in 2006 related to the
Companys manufacture of VEGF Trap clinical supplies. Recognition of deferred revenue related to
sanofi-aventis up-front payments also increased in the second quarter of 2006 from the same period
in 2005, due to our January 2006 receipt of a $25.0 million non-refundable, up-front payment from
sanofi-aventis related to the expansion of the companies VEGF Trap collaboration to include Japan.
As of June 30, 2006, $75.2 million of the original $105.0 million of up-front payments was
deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods.
Contract research and development revenue earned from Procter & Gamble decreased in the second
quarter of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005, as the research activities being pursued under
our December 2000 collaboration agreement with Procter & Gamble, as amended, were completed on June
30, 2005. Since the second quarter of 2005, we have not received, and do not expect to receive,
any further contract research and development revenue from Procter & Gamble.
Contract manufacturing revenue relates to our long-term agreement with Merck & Co., Inc.,
which expires in October 2006, to manufacture a vaccine intermediate at our Rensselaer, New York
facility. Contract manufacturing revenue increased in the second quarter of 2006 from the same
period of 2005 as we shipped more product to Merck in 2006. Revenue and the related manufacturing
expense are recognized as product is shipped, after acceptance by Merck. Included in contract
manufacturing revenue in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were $0.4 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, of deferred revenue associated with capital improvement reimbursements paid by Merck
prior to commencement of production. As of June 30, 2006, the remaining deferred balance of
Mercks capital improvement reimbursements totaled $0.4 million, which will be recognized as
revenue as product is shipped based upon Mercks order quantities through October 2006.
Expenses:
Total operating expenses decreased to $43.5 million in the second quarter of 2006 from $48.5
million in the same period of 2005, due, in part, to our lower headcount. Our average headcount
declined to 583 in the second quarter of 2006 from 731 in the same period of 2005 primarily as a
28
result of workforce reductions made in the fourth quarter of 2005. (See Severance Costs
below.)
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 include a total of $4.6 million and
$5.3 million of Stock Option Expense, respectively, as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Expenses before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion of Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Option Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
38.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Expenses before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion of Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Option Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development Expenses:
Research and development expenses decreased to $34.4 million in the second quarter of 2006
from $40.6 million in the same period of 2005. The following table summarizes the major categories
of our research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Payroll and benefits (1) |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
Clinical trial expenses |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Clinical manufacturing costs (2) |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Research and preclinical development costs |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Occupancy and other operating costs |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $2.2 million and $2.9 million of Stock Option Expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the full cost of manufacturing drug for use in research, preclinical
development, and clinical trials, including related payroll and benefits, Stock Option
Expense, manufacturing materials and supplies, depreciation, and occupancy costs of our
Rensselaer manufacturing facility. Includes $0.4 million of Stock Option Expense for both
the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. |
Payroll and benefits decreased principally due to our lower headcount in the second
quarter of 2006, as described above. Clinical trial expenses decreased primarily due to lower IL-1
Trap costs in 2006, as we discontinued clinical development of IL-1 Trap in adult rheumatoid
arthritis
29
and osteoarthritis in the second half of 2005. This decrease was partly offset by higher 2006
VEGF Trap-Eye costs as we initiated a phase 2 clinical trial in wet AMD. Clinical manufacturing
costs increased because of higher costs in 2006 related to manufacturing VEGF Trap clinical
supplies, which were partially offset by lower costs related to manufacturing IL-1 Trap clinical
supplies. Research and preclinical development costs decreased primarily because of our lower 2006
headcount and lower preclinical IL-1 Trap development costs in 2006. Occupancy and other operating
costs decreased primarily due to our lower 2006 headcount.
Contract Manufacturing Expenses:
Contract manufacturing expenses increased to $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2006 from
$1.7 million in the comparable quarter of 2005 primarily because we shipped more product to Merck.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses increased to $6.3 million in the second quarter of 2006
from $6.2 million in the same period of 2005 as higher administrative personnel-related costs were
offset primarily by lower facility-related expenses and consulting costs in the second quarter of
2006.
Other Income and Expense:
In June 2005, we and Procter & Gamble amended our collaboration agreement and agreed that the
research activities of both companies under the collaboration agreement were completed. In
connection with the amendment, Procter & Gamble agreed to make a one-time $5.6 million payment to
us, which we recognized as other contract income in the second quarter of 2005.
Investment income increased to $3.7 million in the second quarter of 2006 from $2.5 million in
the same period of 2005 due primarily to higher effective interest rates on investment securities
in 2006. Interest expense was $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005. Interest
expense is attributable primarily to $200.0 million of convertible notes issued in October 2001,
which mature in 2008 and bear interest at 5.5% per annum.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Net Loss:
Regeneron reported a net loss of $44.0 million, or $0.77 per share (basic and diluted), for
the first half of 2006 compared to a net loss of $31.1 million, or $0.56 per share (basic and
diluted), for the same period of 2005. Results for the first half of 2005 included a $25.0 million
one-time, non-recurring payment from sanofi-aventis, which was recognized as other contract income,
in connection with the January 2005 amendment to our collaboration agreement to exclude from the
scope of the collaboration the development and commercialization of the VEGF Trap-Eye.
30
Revenues:
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
(In millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Contract research & development revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sanofi-aventis Group |
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract research &
development revenue |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Contract manufacturing revenue |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earn contract research and development revenue from sanofi-aventis in connection with the
companies VEGF Trap collaboration which, as detailed below, consists partly of reimbursement for
research and development expenses and partly of the recognition of
revenue related to a total of $105.0
million of non-refundable, up-front payments received in 2003 and 2006. Non-refundable, up-front
payments are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the period over which we are
obligated to perform services in accordance with SAB 104.
Sanofi-aventis Contract Research & Development Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Regeneron expense reimbursement |
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
Recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front payments |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanofi-aventis reimbursement of Regeneron VEGF Trap expenses increased in the first half
of 2006 from the same period in 2005, primarily due to higher costs in 2006 related to the
Companys manufacture of VEGF Trap clinical supplies. Recognition of deferred revenue related to
sanofi-aventis up-front payments also increased in the first half of 2006 from the same period in
2005, due to our January 2006 receipt of a $25.0 million non-refundable, up-front payment from
sanofi-aventis related to the expansion of the companies VEGF Trap collaboration to include Japan.
Contract research and development revenue earned from Procter & Gamble decreased in the first
half of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005, as the research activities being pursued under
our December 2000 collaboration agreement with Procter & Gamble, as amended, were completed on June
30, 2005. Since the second quarter of 2005, we have not received, and do not expect to receive,
any further contract research and development revenue from Procter & Gamble.
Contract manufacturing revenue increased in the first half of 2006 from the same period of
2005 as we shipped more product to Merck in 2006. Included in contract manufacturing revenue in
the first half of 2006 and 2005 were $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of deferred
revenue associated with capital improvement reimbursements paid by Merck prior to commencement of
production.
31
Expenses:
Total operating expenses decreased to $83.4 million in the first half of 2006 from $93.1
million in the same period of 2005, due, in part, to our lower headcount, as previously described
above. (Also see Severance Costs below.)
Operating expenses in the first half of 2006 and 2005 include a total of $8.5 million and
$10.7 million of Stock Option Expense, respectively, as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Expenses before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion of Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Option Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
74.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
83.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Expenses before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion of Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Expenses as |
|
Expenses |
|
Option Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Reported |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
76.5 |
|
Contract manufacturing |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
93.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development Expenses:
Research and development expenses decreased to $66.5 million in the second half of 2006 from
$76.5 million in the same period of 2005. The following table summarizes the major categories of
our research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Payroll and benefits (1) |
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
$ |
(6.7 |
) |
Clinical trial expenses |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Clinical manufacturing costs (2) |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Research and preclinical development costs |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Occupancy and other operating costs |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
|
$ |
76.5 |
|
|
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $3.8 million and $5.9 million of Stock Option Expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the full cost of manufacturing drug for use in research, preclinical
development, and clinical trials, including related payroll and benefits, Stock Option
Expense, manufacturing materials and supplies, depreciation, and occupancy costs of our
Rensselaer manufacturing facility. Includes $0.7
million and $0.8 million of Stock Option Expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. |
32
Payroll and benefits decreased principally due to our lower headcount in the first half
of 2006. Clinical trial expenses decreased primarily due to lower IL-1 Trap costs in 2006 as we
discontinued clinical development of IL-1 Trap in adult rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in
the second half of 2005. This decrease was partly offset by higher 2006 VEGF Trap-Eye costs
primarily in connection with initiating a phase 2 clinical trial in wet AMD. Clinical
manufacturing costs increased because of higher costs in 2006 related to manufacturing VEGF Trap
clinical supplies, which were partially offset by lower costs related to manufacturing IL-1 Trap
clinical supplies. Research and preclinical development costs decreased primarily because of our
lower 2006 headcount and lower preclinical IL-1 Trap development costs in 2006. Occupancy and
other operating costs decreased primarily due to our lower 2006 headcount offset, in part, by
higher costs for utilities in 2006.
Contract Manufacturing Expenses:
Contract manufacturing expenses increased to $4.7 million in the first half of 2006 from $4.2
million in the comparable period of 2005 primarily because we shipped more product to Merck.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses decreased to $12.2 million in the first half of 2006 from
$12.4 million in the same period of 2005. In 2006, lower facility-related expenses and consulting
costs were partly offset by higher patent-related and administrative personnel-related expenses.
Other Income and Expense:
As described above, in January 2005 we received a one-time $25.0 million payment from
sanofi-aventis, which was recognized as other contract income in the first half of 2005. In June
2005, we and Procter & Gamble amended our collaboration agreement and agreed that the research
activities of both companies under the collaboration agreement were completed. In connection with
the amendment, Procter & Gamble agreed to make a one-time $5.6 million payment to us, which we
recognized as other contract income in the first half of 2005.
Investment income increased to $7.2 million in the first half of 2006 from $4.8 million in the
same period of 2005 due primarily to higher effective interest rates on investment securities in
2006. Interest expense was $6.0 million in the first half of 2006 and 2005. Interest expense is
attributable primarily to $200.0 million of convertible notes issued in October 2001, which mature
in 2008 and bear interest at 5.5% per annum.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception in 1988, we have financed our operations primarily through offerings of
our equity securities, a private placement of convertible debt, revenue earned under our past and
present research and development and contract manufacturing agreements, including our agreements
with sanofi-aventis and Merck, and investment income.
33
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Cash (Used in) Provided by Operations:
At June 30, 2006, we had $304.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities
compared with $316.7 million at December 31, 2005. In January 2006, we received a $25.0 million
non-refundable, up-front payment from sanofi-aventis related to the expansion of the companies
VEGF Trap collaboration to include Japan.
In the first half of 2006, our net loss was $44.0 million; however, cash used in our
operations was only $15.4 million, principally because the above-described $25.0 million payment
from sanofi-aventis was receivable at December 31, 2005 and paid in January 2006. In the first
half of 2005, our net loss was $31.1 million; however, cash provided by our operations was $4.5
million, principally due to receipts during this period from the sanofi-aventis Group for (i)
reimbursement of VEGF Trap development expenses incurred by us and (ii) a $25.0 million clinical
milestone payment earned in December 2004.
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $58.4 million in the first half of 2006 compared to
net cash provided by investing activities of $44.4 million in the same period in 2005, due
primarily to an increase in purchases of marketable securities net of sales or maturities. In the
first half of 2006, purchases of marketable securities exceeded sales or maturities by $57.4
million, whereas in the first half of 2005, sales or maturities of marketable securities exceeded
purchases by $47.3 million.
Cash Provided by Financing Activities:
Cash provided by financing activities increased to $4.2 million in the first half of 2006 from
$1.0 million in the same period in 2005 due primarily to an increase in issuances of Common Stock
in connection with exercises of stock options.
The sanofi-aventis Group Agreement:
Under our collaboration agreement with sanofi-aventis, agreed upon worldwide VEGF Trap
development expenses incurred by both companies during the term of the agreement, including costs
associated with the manufacture of clinical drug supply, will be funded by sanofi-aventis. If the
collaboration becomes profitable, we will be obligated to reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of these
development expenses, including 50% of the $25.0 million payment received in connection with the
January 2005 amendment to our collaboration agreement, in accordance with a formula based on the
amount of development expenses and our share of the collaboration profits and Japan royalties, or
at a faster rate at our option. In addition, if the first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product
for intraocular delivery to the eye predates the first commercial sale of a VEGF Trap product under
the collaboration by two years, we will begin reimbursing sanofi-aventis for up to $7.5 million of
VEGF Trap development expenses in accordance with a formula until the first commercial VEGF Trap
sale under the collaboration occurs.
34
Sanofi-aventis has the right to terminate the agreement without cause with at least twelve
months advance notice. Upon termination of the agreement for any reason, any remaining obligation
to reimburse sanofi-aventis for 50% of VEGF Trap development expenses will terminate and we will
retain all rights to the VEGF Trap.
Severance Costs:
In September 2005, we announced plans to reduce our workforce by approximately 165 employees
in connection with narrowing the focus of our research and development efforts, substantial
improvements in manufacturing productivity, the June 2005 expiration of our collaboration with
Procter & Gamble, and the expected completion of contract manufacturing for Merck in late 2006.
The majority of the headcount reduction occurred in the fourth quarter of 2005, with the remainder
planned for 2006 following the completion of our contract manufacturing activities for Merck.
Costs associated with the workforce reduction are comprised principally of severance payments
and related payroll taxes, employee benefits, and outplacement services. Termination costs related
to 2005 workforce reductions were expensed in the fourth quarter of 2005, and included $0.2 million
of non-cash expenses. Estimated termination costs associated with the planned workforce reduction
in 2006 were measured in October 2005 and are being expensed ratably over the expected service
period of the affected employees in accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities. We estimate that total costs associated with the 2005 and planned 2006
workforce reductions will approximate $2.6 million, of which $2.2 million was charged to expense in
the fourth quarter of 2005 and $0.4 million was charged to expense in the first half of 2006. We
anticipate cost savings of approximately $8 million in 2006 resulting from the implementation of
our workforce reduction.
Capital Expenditures:
Our additions to property, plant, and equipment totaled $1.0 million and $3.8 million for the
first half of 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the remainder of 2006, we expect to incur
approximately $2 million to $4 million in capital expenditures which will primarily consist of
equipment for our manufacturing, research, and development activities.
Funding Requirements:
We expect to continue to incur substantial funding requirements primarily for research and
development activities (including preclinical and clinical testing).
Before taking into account reimbursements from sanofi-aventis, we currently anticipate that approximately
55%-65% of our expenditures for 2006 will be directed toward the preclinical and clinical
development of product candidates, including the VEGF Trap, VEGF Trap-Eye, and IL-1 Trap;
approximately 20%-25% of our expenditures for 2006 will be applied to our basic research activities
and the continued development of our novel technology platforms; and the remainder of our
expenditures for 2006 will be used for capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.
35
The amount we need to fund operations will depend on various factors, including the status of
competitive products, the success of our research and development programs, the potential future
need to expand our professional and support staff and facilities, the status of patents and
other intellectual property rights, the delay or failure of a clinical trial of any of our
potential drug candidates, and the continuation, extent, and success of our collaboration with
sanofi-aventis. Clinical trial costs are dependent, among other things, on the size and duration
of trials, fees charged for services provided by clinical trial investigators and other third
parties, the costs for manufacturing the product candidate for use in the trials, supplies,
laboratory tests, and other expenses. The amount of funding that will be required for our clinical
programs depends upon the results of our research and preclinical programs and early-stage clinical
trials, regulatory requirements, the clinical trials underway plus additional clinical trials that
we decide to initiate, and the various factors that affect the cost of each trial as described
above. In the future, if we are able to successfully develop, market, and sell certain of our
product candidates, we may be required to pay royalties or otherwise share the profits generated on
such sales in connection with our collaboration and licensing agreements.
We expect that expenses related to the filing, prosecution, defense, and enforcement of patent
and other intellectual property claims will continue to be substantial as a result of patent
filings and prosecutions in the United States and foreign countries.
We believe that our existing capital resources will enable us to meet operating needs through
at least mid-2008. However, this is a forward-looking statement based on our current operating
plan, and there may be a change in projected revenues or expenses that would lead to our capital
being consumed significantly before such time. If there is insufficient capital to fund all of our
planned operations and activities, we believe we would prioritize available capital to fund
preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates. We have no off-balance sheet
arrangements and do not guarantee the obligations of any other entity. As of June 30, 2006, we had
no established banking arrangements through which we could obtain short-term financing or a line of
credit. In the event we need additional financing for the operation of our business, we will
consider collaborative arrangements and additional public or private financing, including
additional equity financing. In January 2005, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3
to sell, in one or more offerings, up to $200.0 million of equity or debt securities, together or
separately, which registration statement was declared effective in February 2005. However, there
is no assurance that we will be able to complete any such offerings of securities. Factors
influencing the availability of additional financing include our progress in product development,
investor perception of our prospects, and the general condition of the financial markets. We may
not be able to secure the necessary funding through new collaborative arrangements or additional
public or private offerings. If we cannot raise adequate funds to satisfy our capital
requirements, we may have to delay, scale-back, or eliminate certain of our research and
development activities or future operations. This could harm our business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, there were no changes to our critical accounting
policies and significant judgments and estimates, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates
primarily from our investment of available cash balances in investment grade corporate and U.S.
government securities. We do not believe we are materially exposed to changes in interest rates.
Under our current policies we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to
interest rate changes. We estimated that a one percent change in interest rates would result in an
approximately $0.9 million and $1.1 million change in the fair market value of our investment
portfolio at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in the impact of an interest rate
change at June 30, 2006, compared to June 30, 2005, is due to decreases in our investment
portfolios balance and duration to maturity at the end of June 2006 versus the end of June 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer each concluded that, as of the
end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
applicable rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30,
2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings in the course of our business. We do
not expect any such current legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our business or
financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We operate in an environment that involves a number of significant risks and uncertainties. We
caution you to read the following risk factors, which have affected, and/or in the future could
affect, our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows. The risks described
below include forward-looking statements, and actual events and our actual results may differ
substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Additional risks and
37
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our
business operations. Furthermore, additional risks and uncertainties are described under other
captions in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005 and should be considered by our investors.
Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Need for Additional Financing
We have had a history of operating losses and we may never achieve profitability. If we continue to
incur operating losses, we may be unable to continue our operations.
From inception on January 8, 1988 through June 30, 2006, we had a cumulative loss of $629.2
million. If we continue to incur operating losses and fail to become a profitable company, we may
be unable to continue our operations. We have no products that are available for sale and do not
know when we will have products available for sale, if ever. In the absence of revenue from the
sale of products or other sources, the amount, timing, nature or source of which cannot be
predicted, our losses will continue as we conduct our research and development activities. We
currently receive contract manufacturing revenue from our agreement with Merck and, until June 30,
2005, we received contract research and development revenue from our agreement with The Procter &
Gamble Company. Our agreement with Procter & Gamble expired in June 2005 and our agreement with
Merck will expire before the end of 2006. The expiration of these agreements results in a
significant loss of revenue to the Company.
We will need additional funding in the future, which may not be available to us, and which may
force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization
efforts.
We will need to expend substantial resources for research and development, including costs
associated with clinical testing of our product candidates. We believe our existing capital
resources will enable us to meet operating needs through at least mid-2008; however, our projected
revenue may decrease or our expenses may increase and that would lead to our capital being consumed
significantly before such time. We will likely require additional financing in the future and we
may not be able to raise such additional funds. If we are able to obtain additional financing
through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, such sales may be dilutive to our
shareholders. Debt financing arrangements may require us to pledge certain assets or enter into
covenants that would restrict our business activities or our ability to incur further indebtedness
and may contain other terms that are not favorable to our shareholders. If we are unable to raise
sufficient funds to complete the development of our product candidates, we may face delay,
reduction or elimination of our research and development programs or preclinical or clinical
trials, in which case our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially
harmed.
We have a significant amount of debt and may have insufficient cash to satisfy our debt service and
repayment obligations. In addition, the amount of our debt could impede our operations and
flexibility.
We have a significant amount of convertible debt and semi-annual interest payment obligations.
This debt, unless converted to shares of our common stock, will mature in October
38
2008. We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make required
payments on our debt. Even if we are able to meet our debt service obligations, the
amount of debt we already have could hurt our ability to obtain any necessary financing in the
future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, or other purposes. In
addition, our debt obligations could require us to use a substantial portion of cash to pay
principal and interest on our debt, instead of applying those funds to other purposes, such as
research and development, working capital, and capital expenditures.
Risks Related to Development of Our Product Candidates
Successful development of any of our product candidates is highly uncertain.
Only a small minority of all research and development programs ultimately result in
commercially successful drugs. We have never developed a drug that has been approved for marketing
and sale, and we may never succeed in developing an approved drug. Even if clinical trials
demonstrate safety and effectiveness of any of our product candidates for a specific disease and
the necessary regulatory approvals are obtained, the commercial success of any of our product
candidates will depend upon their acceptance by patients, the medical community, and third-party
payers and on our partners ability to successfully manufacture and commercialize our product
candidates. Our product candidates are delivered either by intravenous infusion or by intravitreal
or subcutaneous injections, which are generally less well received by patients than tablet or
capsule delivery. If our products are not successfully commercialized, we will not be able to
recover the significant investment we have made in developing such products and our business would
be severely harmed.
We intend to study our lead product candidates, the VEGF Trap, VEGF Trap-Eye, and IL-1 Trap,
in a wide variety of indications. We intend to study the VEGF Trap in a variety of cancer
settings, the VEGF Trap-Eye in different eye diseases and ophthalmologic indications, and the IL-1
Trap in a variety of systemic inflammatory disorders. Many of these current trials are exploratory
studies designed to identify what diseases and uses, if any, are best suited for our product
candidates. It is likely that our product candidates will not demonstrate the requisite efficacy
and/or safety profile to support continued development for most of the indications that are to be
studied. In fact, our product candidates may not demonstrate the requisite efficacy and safety
profile to support the continued development for any of the indications or uses.
Clinical trials required for our product candidates are expensive and time-consuming, and their
outcome is highly uncertain. If any of our drug trials are delayed or achieve unfavorable results,
we will have to delay or may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.
We must conduct extensive testing of our product candidates before we can obtain regulatory
approval to market and sell them. We need to conduct both preclinical animal testing and human
clinical trials. Conducting these trials is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process. These
tests and trials may not achieve favorable results for many reasons, including, among others,
failure of the product candidate to demonstrate safety or efficacy, the development of serious or
life-threatening adverse events (or side effects) caused by or connected with exposure to the
product candidate, difficulty in enrolling and maintaining subjects in the clinical trial, lack
39
of sufficient supplies of the product candidate, and the failure of clinical investigators, trial
monitors and other consultants, or trial subjects to comply with the trial plan or protocol. A
clinical trial may fail because it did not include a sufficient number of patients to detect the endpoint
being measured or reach statistical significance. A clinical trial may also fail because the
dose(s) of the investigational drug included in the trial were either too low or too high to
determine the optimal effect of the investigational drug in the disease setting. For example, we
are studying higher doses of the IL-1 Trap in different diseases after a phase 2 trial using lower
doses of the IL-1 Trap in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis failed to achieve its primary
endpoint.
We will need to reevaluate any drug candidate that does not test favorably and either conduct
new trials, which are expensive and time consuming, or abandon the drug development program. Even
if we obtain positive results from preclinical or clinical trials, we may not achieve the same
success in future trials. Many companies in the biopharmaceutical industry, including us, have
suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after promising results have been obtained
in earlier trials. The failure of clinical trials to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for the
desired indication(s) could harm the development of the product candidate(s), and our business,
financial condition, and results of operations may be materially harmed.
The development of serious or life-threatening side effects with any of our product candidates
would lead to delay or discontinuation of development, which could severely harm our business.
During the conduct of clinical trials, patients report changes in their health, including
illnesses, injuries, and discomforts, to their study doctor. Often, it is not possible to determine
whether or not the drug candidate being studied caused these conditions. Various illnesses,
injuries, and discomforts have been reported from time-to-time during clinical trials of our
product candidates. Although our current drug candidates appeared to be generally well tolerated in
clinical trials conducted to date, it is possible as we test any of them in larger, longer, and
more extensive clinical programs, illnesses, injuries, and discomforts that were observed in
earlier trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in smaller previous
trials, will be reported by patients. Many times, side effects are only detectable after
investigational drugs are tested in large scale, phase 3 clinical trials or, in some cases, after
they are made available to patients after approval. If additional clinical experience indicates
that any of our product candidates has many side effects or causes serious or life-threatening side
effects, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, which would severely harm
our business.
Our VEGF Trap is being studied for the potential treatment of certain types of cancer and our
VEGF Trap-Eye candidate is being studied in diseases of the eye. There are many potential safety
concerns associated with significant blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF.
These risks, based on the clinical and preclinical experience of systemically delivered VEGF
inhibitors, including the systemic delivery of the VEGF Trap, include bleeding, hypertension, and
proteinuria. These serious side effects and other serious side effects have been reported in our
systemic VEGF Trap studies in cancer and diseases of the eye. In addition, patients given infusions
of any protein, including the VEGF Trap delivered through intravenous administration, may develop
severe hypersensitivity reactions, referred to as infusion reactions. These and other
40
complications or side effects could harm the development of the VEGF Trap for the treatment of cancer or the VEGF
Trap-Eye for the treatment of diseases of the eye.
Although the IL-1 Trap was generally well tolerated and was not associated with any
drug-related serious adverse events in the phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis study completed in 2003,
safety or tolerability concerns may arise as we test higher doses of the IL-1 Trap in patients with
other inflammatory diseases and disorders. Like TNF-antagonists such as EnbrelÒ (Amgen) and
RemicadeÒ (Centocor), the IL-1 Trap affects the immune defense system of the body by blocking
some of its functions. Therefore, there may be an increased risk for infections to develop in
patients treated with the IL-1 Trap. In addition, patients given infusions of the IL-1 Trap have
developed hypersensitivity reactions, referred to as infusion reactions. These and other
complications or side effects could harm the development of the IL-1 Trap.
Our product candidates in development are recombinant proteins that could cause an immune response,
resulting in the creation of harmful or neutralizing antibodies against the therapeutic protein.
In addition to the safety, efficacy, manufacturing, and regulatory hurdles faced by our
product candidates, the administration of recombinant proteins frequently causes an immune
response, resulting in the creation of antibodies against the therapeutic protein. The antibodies
can have no effect or can totally neutralize the effectiveness of the protein, or require that
higher doses be used to obtain a therapeutic effect. In some cases, the antibody can cross react
with the patients own proteins, resulting in an auto-immune type disease. Whether antibodies
will be created can often not be predicted from preclinical or clinical experiments, and their
appearance is often delayed, so that there can be no assurance that neutralizing antibodies will
not be created at a later date in some cases even after pivotal clinical trials have been
completed. Subjects who received the IL-1 Trap in clinical trials have developed antibodies. It is
possible that as we test the VEGF Trap with more sensitive assays in different patient populations
and larger clinical trials, we will find that subjects given the VEGF Trap develop antibodies to
the product candidate.
We may be unable to formulate or manufacture our product candidates in a way that is suitable for
clinical or commercial use.
Changes in product formulations and manufacturing processes may be required as product
candidates progress in clinical development and are ultimately commercialized. If we are unable to
develop suitable product formulations or manufacturing processes to support large scale clinical
testing of our product candidates, including the VEGF Trap, VEGF Trap-Eye, and IL-1 Trap, we may be
unable to supply necessary materials for our clinical trials, which would delay the development of
our product candidates. Similarly, if we are unable to supply sufficient quantities of our product
or develop product formulations suitable for commercial use, we will not be able to successfully
commercialize our product candidates.
41
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we cannot protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or our patents are insufficient to
protect our proprietary rights, our business and competitive position will be harmed.
Our business requires using sensitive and proprietary technology and other information that we
protect as trade secrets. We seek to prevent improper disclosure of these trade secrets through
confidentiality agreements. If our trade secrets are improperly exposed, either by our own
employees or our collaborators, it would help our competitors and adversely affect our business. We
will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the
extent that our rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained
as trade secrets. The patent position of biotechnology companies involves complex legal and factual
questions and, therefore, enforceability cannot be predicted with certainty. Our patents may be
challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. Patent applications filed outside the United States may
be challenged by third parties who file an opposition. Such opposition proceedings are increasingly
common in the European Union and are costly to defend. We have patent applications that are being
opposed and it is likely that we will need to defend additional patent applications in the future.
Our patent rights may not provide us with a proprietary position or competitive advantages against
competitors. Furthermore, even if the outcome is favorable to us, the enforcement of our
intellectual property rights can be extremely expensive and time consuming.
We may be restricted in our development and/or commercialization activities by, and could be
subject to damage awards if we are found to have infringed, third party patents or other
proprietary rights.
Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the
patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. Other parties may allege that they have
blocking patents to our products in clinical development, either because they claim to hold
proprietary rights to the composition of a product or the way it is manufactured or used.
We are aware of patents and pending applications owned by Genentech that claim certain
chimeric VEGF receptor compositions. Although we do not believe that the VEGF Trap or VEGF
Trap-Eye infringes any valid claim in these patents or patent applications, Genentech could
initiate a lawsuit for patent infringement and assert its patents are valid and cover the VEGF Trap
or VEGF Trap-Eye. Genentech may be motivated to initiate such a lawsuit at some point in an effort
to impair our ability to develop and sell the VEGF Trap or VEGF Trap-Eye, which represents a
potential competitive threat to Genentechs VEGF-binding products and product candidates. An
adverse determination by a court in any such potential patent litigation would likely materially
harm our business by requiring us to seek a license, which may not be available, or resulting in
our inability to manufacture, develop and sell the VEGF Trap or VEGF Trap-Eye or in a damage award.
Any patent holders could sue us for damages and seek to prevent us from manufacturing,
selling, or developing our drug candidates, and a court may find that we are infringing validly
issued patents of third parties. In the event that the manufacture, use, or sale of any of our
clinical candidates infringes on the patents or violates other proprietary rights of third parties,
we may be
42
prevented from pursuing product development, manufacturing, and commercialization of our drugs
and may be required to pay costly damages. Such a result may materially harm our business,
financial condition, and results of operations. Legal disputes are likely to be costly and time
consuming to defend.
We seek to obtain licenses to patents when, in our judgment, such licenses are needed. If any
licenses are required, we may not be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms,
if at all. The failure to obtain any such license could prevent us from developing or
commercializing any one or more of our product candidates, which could severely harm our business.
Regulatory and Litigation Risks
If we do not obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, we will not be able to market
or sell them.
We cannot sell or market products without regulatory approval. If we do not obtain and
maintain regulatory approval for our product candidates, the value of our company and our results
of operations will be harmed. In the United States, we must obtain and maintain approval from the
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for each drug we intend to sell. Obtaining FDA
approval is typically a lengthy and expensive process, and approval is highly uncertain. Foreign
governments also regulate drugs distributed in their country and approval in any country is likely
to be a lengthy and expensive process, and approval is highly uncertain. None of our product
candidates has ever received regulatory approval to be marketed and sold in the United States or
any other country. We may never receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.
If the testing or use of our products harms people, we could be subject to costly and damaging
product liability claims. We could also face costly and damaging claims arising from employment
law, securities law, environmental law, or other applicable laws governing our operations.
The testing, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of drugs for use in people expose us to
product liability risk. Any informed consent or waivers obtained from people who sign up for our
clinical trials may not protect us from liability or the cost of litigation. Our product liability
insurance may not cover all potential liabilities or may not completely cover any liability arising
from any such litigation. Moreover, we may not have access to liability insurance or be able to
maintain our insurance on acceptable terms.
Our operations may involve hazardous materials and are subject to environmental, health, and safety
laws and regulations. We may incur substantial liability arising from our activities involving the
use of hazardous materials.
As a biopharmaceutical company with significant manufacturing operations, we are subject to
extensive environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the use
of hazardous materials. Our research and development and manufacturing activities involve the
controlled use of chemicals, viruses, radioactive compounds, and other hazardous materials.
43
The cost of compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations is substantial. If
an accident involving these materials or an environmental discharge were to occur, we could be held
liable for any resulting damages, or face regulatory actions, which could exceed our resources or
insurance coverage.
Changes in the securities laws and regulations have increased, and are likely to continue to
increase, our costs.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which became law in July 2002, has required changes in some of
our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance practices. In response to the
requirements of that Act, the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market have promulgated new rules and
listing standards covering a variety of subjects. Compliance with these new rules and listing
standards has increased our legal costs, and significantly increased our accounting and auditing
costs, and we expect these costs to continue. These developments may make it more difficult and
more expensive for us to obtain directors and officers liability insurance. Likewise, these
developments may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board
of directors, particularly independent directors, or qualified executive officers.
In future years, if we or our independent registered public accounting firm are unable to conclude
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, the market value of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring
public companies to include a report of management on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K that contains an assessment by management of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the independent
registered public accounting firm auditing our financial statements must attest to and report on
managements assessment and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Our independent registered public accounting firm provided us with an unqualified report as to our
assessment and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2005, which report was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005. However, we cannot assure you that management or our independent registered public
accounting firm will be able to provide such an assessment or unqualified report as of future
year-ends. In this event, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which could result in a decrease in the market value of our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
If our collaboration with sanofi-aventis for the VEGF Trap is terminated, our business operations
and our ability to develop, manufacture, and commercialize the VEGF Trap in the time expected, or
at all, would be harmed.
We rely heavily on sanofi-aventis to assist with the development of the VEGF Trap oncology
program. Sanofi-aventis funds all of the development expenses incurred by both companies in
connection with the VEGF Trap oncology program. If the VEGF Trap oncology program continues, we
will rely on sanofi-aventis to assist with funding the VEGF Trap program, provide
44
commercial manufacturing capacity, enroll and monitor clinical trials, obtain regulatory
approval, particularly outside the United States, and provide sales and marketing support. While we
cannot assure you that the VEGF Trap will ever be successfully developed and commercialized, if
sanofi-aventis does not perform its obligations in a timely manner, or at all, our ability to
develop, manufacture, and commercialize the VEGF Trap in cancer indications will be significantly
adversely affected. Sanofi-aventis has the right to terminate its collaboration agreement with us
at any time upon twelve months advance notice. If sanofi-aventis were to terminate its
collaboration agreement with us, we would not have the resources or skills to replace those of our
partner, which could cause significant delays in the development and/or manufacture of the VEGF
Trap and result in substantial additional costs to us. We have no sales, marketing, or distribution
capabilities and would have to develop or outsource these capabilities. Termination of the
sanofi-aventis collaboration agreement would create substantial new and additional risks to the
successful development of the VEGF Trap oncology program.
Our collaborators and service providers may fail to perform adequately in their efforts to support
the development, manufacture, and commercialization of our drug candidates.
We depend upon third-party collaborators, including sanofi-aventis and service providers such
as clinical research organizations, outside testing laboratories, clinical investigator sites, and
third-party manufacturers and product packagers and labelers, to assist us in the development of
our product candidates. If any of our existing collaborators or service providers breaches or
terminates its agreement with us or does not perform its development or manufacturing services
under an agreement in a timely manner or at all, we could experience additional costs, delays, and
difficulties in the development or ultimate commercialization of our product candidates.
Risks Related to the Manufacture of Our Product Candidates
We have limited manufacturing capacity, which could inhibit our ability to successfully develop or
commercialize our drugs.
Before approving a new drug or biologic product, the FDA requires that the facilities at which
the product will be manufactured be in compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or
cGMP requirements. Manufacturing product candidates in compliance with these regulatory
requirements is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. To be successful, our products must be
manufactured for development, following approval, in commercial quantities, in compliance with
regulatory requirements, and at competitive costs. If we or any of our product collaborators or
third-party manufacturers, product packagers, or labelers are unable to maintain regulatory
compliance, the FDA can impose regulatory sanctions, including, among other things, refusal to
approve a pending application for a new drug or biologic product, or revocation of a pre-existing
approval. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be
materially harmed.
Our manufacturing facility is likely to be inadequate to produce sufficient quantities of
product for commercial sale. We intend to rely on our corporate collaborators, as well as contract
manufacturers, to produce the large quantities of drug material needed for commercialization of our
products. We rely entirely on third-party manufacturers for filling and finishing services. We will
have to depend on these manufacturers to deliver material on a timely basis and to comply
45
with
regulatory requirements. If we are unable to supply sufficient material on acceptable terms, or if
we should encounter delays or difficulties in our relationships with our corporate collaborators or
contract manufacturers, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be
materially harmed.
We may expand our own manufacturing capacity to support commercial production of active
pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, for our product candidates. This will require substantial
additional funds, and we will need to hire and train significant numbers of employees and
managerial personnel to staff our facility. Start-up costs can be large and scale-up entails
significant risks related to process development and manufacturing yields. We may be unable to
develop manufacturing facilities that are sufficient to produce drug material for clinical trials
or commercial use. In addition, we may be unable to secure adequate filling and finishing services
to support our products. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations
may be materially harmed.
We may be unable to obtain key raw materials and supplies for the manufacture of our product
candidates. In addition, we may face difficulties in developing or acquiring production technology
and managerial personnel to manufacture sufficient quantities of our product candidates at
reasonable costs and in compliance with applicable quality assurance and environmental regulations
and governmental permitting requirements.
If any of our clinical programs are discontinued, we may face costs related to the unused capacity
at our manufacturing facilities.
We have large-scale manufacturing operations in Rensselaer, New York. Under a long-term
manufacturing agreement with Merck, which expires in October 2006, we produce an intermediate for a
Merck pediatric vaccine at our facility in Rensselaer, New York. We also use our facilities to
produce API for our own clinical and preclinical candidates. When we no longer use our facilities
to manufacture the Merck intermediate or if clinical candidates are discontinued, we will have to
absorb overhead costs and inefficiencies.
Certain of our raw materials are single-sourced from third parties; third-party supply failures
could adversely affect our ability to supply our products.
Certain raw materials necessary for manufacturing and formulation of our product candidates
are provided by single-source unaffiliated third-party suppliers. We would be unable to obtain
these raw materials for an indeterminate period of time if these third-party single-source
suppliers were to cease or interrupt production or otherwise fail to supply these materials or
products to us for any reason, including due to regulatory requirements or action, due to adverse
financial developments at or affecting the supplier, or due to labor shortages or disputes. This,
in turn, could materially and adversely affect our ability to manufacture our product candidates
for use in clinical trials, which could materially and adversely affect our business and future
prospects.
Also, certain of the raw materials required in the manufacturing and the formulation of our
clinical candidates may be derived from biological sources, including mammalian tissues, bovine
serum, and human serum albumin. There are certain European regulatory restrictions on using
46
these
biological source materials. If we are required to substitute for these sources to comply with
European regulatory requirements, our clinical development activities may be delayed or
interrupted.
Risks Related to Commercialization of Products
If we are unable to establish sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, or enter into
agreements with third parties to do so, we will be unable to successfully market and sell future
products.
We have no sales or distribution personnel or capabilities and have only a small staff with
marketing capabilities. If we are unable to obtain those capabilities, either by developing our own
organizations or entering into agreements with service providers, we will not be able to
successfully sell any products that we may obtain regulatory approval for and bring to market in
the future. In that event, we will not be able to generate significant revenue, even if our product
candidates are approved. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to hire the qualified sales and
marketing personnel we need or that we will be able to enter into marketing or distribution
agreements with third-party providers on acceptable terms, if at all. Under the terms of our
collaboration agreement with sanofi-aventis, we currently rely on sanofi-aventis for sales,
marketing, and distribution of the VEGF Trap in cancer indications, should it be approved in the
future by regulatory authorities for marketing. We will have to rely on a third party or devote
significant resources to develop our own sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities for our
other product candidates, including the VEGF Trap-Eye, and we may be unsuccessful in developing our
own sales, marketing, and distribution organization.
Even if our product candidates are approved for marketing, their commercial success is highly
uncertain because our competitors may get to the marketplace before we do with better or lower cost
drugs or the market for our product candidates may be too small to support commercialization or
sufficient profitability.
There is substantial competition in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries from
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and chemical companies. Many of our competitors have substantially
greater research, preclinical and clinical product development and manufacturing capabilities, and
financial, marketing, and human resources than we do. Our smaller competitors may also enhance
their competitive position if they acquire or discover patentable inventions, form collaborative
arrangements, or merge with large pharmaceutical companies. Even if we achieve product
commercialization, our competitors have achieved, and may continue to achieve, product
commercialization before our products are approved for marketing and sale.
Genentech has an approved VEGF antagonist, Avastin® (Genentech), on the market for treating
certain cancers and many different pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are working to
develop competing VEGF antagonists, including Novartis, OSI Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer. Many of
these molecules are farther along in development than the VEGF Trap and may offer competitive
advantages over our molecule. Novartis has an ongoing phase 3 clinical development program
evaluating an orally delivered VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor in different cancer settings. Onyx
Pharmaceuticals and Bayer have received approval from the FDA to market and sell the first oral
medication that targets tumor cell growth and new vasculature
47
formation that fuels the growth of
tumors. The marketing approvals for Genentechs VEGF antagonist, Avastin, and their extensive,
ongoing clinical development plan for Avastin in other cancer indications, may make it more
difficult for us to enroll patients in clinical trials to support the VEGF Trap and to obtain
regulatory approval of the VEGF Trap in these cancer settings. This may delay or impair our
ability to successfully develop and commercialize the VEGF Trap. In addition, even if the VEGF
Trap is ever approved for sale for the treatment of certain cancers, it will be difficult for our
drug to compete against Avastin and the Onyx/Bayer kinase inhibitor, because doctors and patients
will have significant experience using these medicines. In addition, an oral medication may be
considerably less expensive for patients than a biologic medication, providing a competitive
advantage to companies that market such products.
The market for eye diseases is also very competitive. OSI Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer are
marketing an approved VEGF inhibitor (Macugen®) for age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).
Novartis and Genentech are collaborating on the commercialization and further development of a VEGF
antibody fragment (Lucentis) for the treatment of wet AMD and other eye indications that was
approved by the FDA in June 2006. In addition, it has been reported that ophthalmologists are
using a third-party reformulated version of Genentechs approved VEGF antagonist, Avastin, with
success for the treatment of wet AMD. The marketing approval of Macugen and Lucentis and the
potential off-label use of Avastin make it more difficult for us to enroll patients in our clinical
trials and successfully develop the VEGF Trap-Eye. Even if the VEGF Trap-Eye is ever approved for
sale for the treatment of eye diseases, it may be difficult for our drug to compete against
Lucentis or Macugen, because doctors and patients will have significant experience using these
medicines. Moreover, the relatively low cost of therapy with Avastin in patients with wet AMD
presents a further competitive challenge in this indication.
The availability of highly effective FDA approved TNF-antagonists such as Enbrel® (Amgen),
Remicade® (Centocor), and Humira® (Abbott Laboratories), and the IL-1 receptor antagonist Kineret®
(Amgen), and other marketed therapies makes it more difficult to successfully develop and
commercialize the IL-1 Trap. This is one of the reasons we discontinued the development of the
IL-1 Trap in adult rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, even if the IL-1 Trap is ever approved for
sale, it will be difficult for our drug to compete against these FDA approved TNF-antagonists in
indications where both are useful because doctors and patients will have significant experience
using these effective medicines. Moreover, in such indications these approved therapeutics may
offer competitive advantages over the IL-1 Trap, such as requiring fewer injections.
There are both small molecules and antibodies in development by third parties that are
designed to block the synthesis of interleukin-1 or inhibit the signaling of interleukin-1. For
example, Novartis is developing an antibody to interleukin-1 and Amgen is developing an antibody to
the interleukin-1 receptor. These drug candidates could offer competitive advantages over the IL-1
Trap. The successful development of these competing molecules could delay or impair our ability to
successfully develop and commercialize the IL-1 Trap. For example, we may find it difficult to
enroll patients in clinical trials for the IL-1 Trap if the companies developing these competing
interleukin-1 inhibitors commence clinical trials in the same indications.
48
We are developing the IL-1 Trap for the treatment of a spectrum of rare diseases associated
with mutations in the CIAS1 gene. These rare genetic disorders affect a small group of people,
estimated to be between several hundred and a few thousand. There may be too few patients with
these genetic disorders to profitably commercialize the IL-1 Trap in this indication.
The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend on obtaining coverage and
reimbursement for use of these products from third-party payers.
Sales of biopharmaceutical products largely depend on the reimbursement of patients medical
expenses by government health care programs and private health insurers. Without the financial
support of the governments or third-party payers, the market for any biopharmaceutical product will
be limited. These third-party payers increasingly challenge the price and examine the
cost-effectiveness of products and services. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement
status of any new therapeutic, particularly if there exist lower-cost standards of care.
Third-party payers may not reimburse sales of our products, which would harm our business.
Risk Related to Employees
We are dependent on our key personnel and if we cannot recruit and retain leaders in our research,
development, manufacturing, and commercial organizations, our business will be harmed.
We are highly dependent on our executive officers. If we are not able to retain any of these
persons or our Chairman, our business may suffer. In particular, we depend on the services of P.
Roy Vagelos, M.D., the Chairman of our board of directors, Leonard Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., our
President and Chief Executive Officer, George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D., our Executive Vice
President, Chief Scientific Officer and President, Regeneron Research Laboratories, Murray A.
Goldberg, our Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,
and Assistant Secretary, Neil Stahl, Ph.D., our Senior Vice President, Preclinical Development and
Biomolecular Science, and Randall G. Rupp, Ph.D., our Senior Vice President, Manufacturing
Operations. There is intense competition in the biotechnology industry for qualified scientists and
managerial personnel in the development, manufacture, and commercialization of drugs. We may not be
able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for developing our
business.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is extremely volatile.
There has been significant volatility in our stock price and generally in the market prices of
biotechnology companies securities. Various factors and events may have a significant impact on
the market price of our common stock. These factors include, by way of example:
|
|
|
progress, delays, or adverse results in clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
announcement of technological innovations or product candidates by us or competitors; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our operating results; |
49
|
|
|
public concern as to the safety or effectiveness of our product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
developments in our relationship with collaborative partners; |
|
|
|
|
developments in the biotechnology industry or in government regulation of healthcare; |
|
|
|
|
large sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors, or significant
shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
arrivals and departures of key personnel; and |
|
|
|
|
general market conditions. |
The trading price of our common stock has been, and could continue to be, subject to wide
fluctuations in response to these and other factors, including the sale or attempted sale of a
large amount of our common stock in the market. Broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect
the market price of our common stock.
Future sales of our common stock by our significant shareholders or us may depress our stock price
and impair our ability to raise funds in new share offerings.
A small number of our shareholders beneficially own a substantial amount of our common stock.
As of April 13, 2006, our seven largest shareholders, including sanofi-aventis, beneficially owned
47.9% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock, assuming, in the case of Leonard S. Schleifer,
M.D. Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer, and P. Roy Vagelos, M.D., our Chairman, the conversion of
their Class A Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of all options held by them which are
exercisable within 60 days of April 13, 2006. As of April 13, 2006, sanofi-aventis owned 2,799,552
shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 5.1% of the shares of Common Stock then
outstanding. Under our stock purchase agreement with sanofi-aventis, through September 5, 2006,
sanofi-aventis may sell no more than 250,000 of these shares in any calendar quarter. After
September 5, 2006, sanofi-aventis may sell no more than 500,000 of these shares in any calendar
quarter. If sanofi-aventis, or our other significant shareholders or we, sell substantial amounts
of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur exists, the
market price of our Common Stock could fall. Sales of Common Stock by our significant shareholders,
including sanofi-aventis, also might make it more difficult for us to raise funds by selling equity
or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Our existing shareholders may be able to exert significant influence over matters requiring
shareholder approval.
Holders of Class A Stock, who are generally the shareholders who purchased their stock from us
before our initial public offering, are entitled to ten votes per share, while holders of Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share. As of April 13, 2006, holders of Class A Stock held 4.1%
of all shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock then outstanding, and had 29.7% of the combined
voting power of all of Common Stock and Class A Stock then outstanding. These shareholders, if
acting together, would be in a position to significantly influence the election of our directors
and to effect or prevent certain corporate transactions that require majority or supermajority
approval of the combined classes, including mergers and other business combinations. This may
result in our company taking corporate actions that you may not consider to be in your best
interest and may affect the price of our Common Stock. As of April 13, 2006:
50
|
|
|
our current officers and directors beneficially owned 14.6% of our outstanding shares of
Common Stock, assuming conversion of their Class A Stock into Common Stock and the exercise
of all options held by such persons which are exercisable within 60 days of April 13, 2006,
and 33.2% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and Class
A Stock, assuming the exercise of all options held by such persons which are exercisable
within 60 days of April 13, 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
our seven largest shareholders beneficially owned 47.9% of our outstanding shares of
Common Stock assuming, in the case of Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief
Executive Officer, and P. Roy Vagelos, M.D., our Chairman, the conversion of their Class A
Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of all options held by them which are exercisable
within 60 days of April 13, 2006. In addition, these seven shareholders held 54.3% of the
combined voting power of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and Class A Stock, assuming
the exercise of all options held by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman which are
exercisable within 60 days of April 13, 2006. |
The anti-takeover effects of provisions of our charter, by-laws, and rights agreement, and of New
York corporate law, could deter, delay, or prevent an acquisition or other change in control of
us and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our by-laws, our rights agreement and
the New York Business Corporation Law contain various provisions that could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change in control of our company or our management that shareholders may
consider favorable or beneficial. Some of these provisions could discourage proxy contests and make
it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors and take other corporate
actions. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock. These provisions include:
|
|
|
authorization to issue blank check preferred stock, which is preferred stock that can
be created and issued by the board of directors without prior shareholder approval, with
rights senior to those of our common shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
a staggered board of directors, so that it would take three successive annual meetings
to replace all of our directors; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that removal of directors may only be effected for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of at least eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote for directors, as well as a requirement that any vacancy on the board of directors may
be filled only by the remaining directors; |
|
|
|
|
any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of shareholders may be taken
without a meeting, only if, prior to such action, all of our shareholders consent, the
effect of which is to require that shareholder action may only be taken at a duly convened
meeting; |
|
|
|
|
any shareholder seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders must
provide timely notice of this intention in writing and meet various other requirements; and |
51
|
|
|
under the New York Business Corporation Law, a plan of merger or consolidation of the
Company must be approved by two-thirds of the votes of all outstanding shares entitled to
vote thereon. See the risk factor immediately above captioned Our existing shareholders
may be able to exert significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval. |
We have a shareholder rights plan which could make it more difficult for a third party to
acquire us without the support of our board of directors and principal shareholders. In addition,
many of our stock options issued under our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan may become fully vested in
connection with a change in control of the Company, as defined in the plan.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On June 9, 2006, we conducted our Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to due notice. A
quorum being present either in person or by proxy, the shareholders voted on the following matters:
1. To elect four Directors to hold office for a three-year term as Class III directors, and
until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
No other matters were voted on. The number of votes cast was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
1. Election of Class II Directors |
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Baker. |
|
68,193,948 |
|
1,341,920 |
Michael S. Brown, M.D. |
|
68,530,409 |
|
1,005,459 |
Arthur F. Ryan |
|
68,681,939 |
|
853,929 |
George L. Sing |
|
68,239,673 |
|
1,296,195 |
The terms of office of Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., Eric M. Shooter, Ph.D., George D.
Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D., Alfred G. Gilman, M.D., Ph.D., Joseph L.
Goldstein, M.D., and P. Roy Vagelos, M.D. continued after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
2. Ratification of the Appointment
of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
69,093,166 |
|
|
|
105,312 |
|
|
|
337,390 |
|
52
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
12.1
|
|
- Statement re: computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
- Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
- Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
- Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
53
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray A. Goldberg
Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and
Assistant Secretary |
|
|
54
EX-12.1
Exhibit 12.1
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income (loss) from equity investee |
|
$ |
(75,178 |
) |
|
$ |
(124,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(107,395 |
) |
|
$ |
41,565 |
|
|
$ |
(95,456 |
) |
|
|
(44,769 |
) |
Fixed charges |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
13,685 |
|
|
|
14,108 |
|
|
|
14,060 |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
6,817 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings |
|
$ |
(71,290 |
) |
|
$ |
(110,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(93,530 |
) |
|
$ |
55,703 |
|
|
$ |
(81,691 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2,657 |
|
|
$ |
11,859 |
|
|
$ |
11,932 |
|
|
$ |
12,175 |
|
|
$ |
12,046 |
|
|
$ |
6,022 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed interest component of rental charges |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
3,888 |
|
|
$ |
13,685 |
|
|
$ |
14,108 |
|
|
$ |
14,060 |
|
|
$ |
13,687 |
|
|
$ |
6,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Due to the registrants losses for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2005, and for the six months ended June
30, 2006, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. To achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1, the registrant must generate additional
earnings of the amounts shown in the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Coverage deficiency |
|
$ |
75,178 |
|
|
$ |
124,572 |
|
|
$ |
107,638 |
|
|
$ |
95,378 |
|
|
$ |
44,730 |
|
EX-31.1
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of CEO Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Leonard S. Schleifer, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2006
|
|
/s/ Leonard S. Schleifer
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
EX-31.2
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of CFO Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Murray A. Goldberg, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2006
|
|
/s/ Murray A. Goldberg
|
|
|
|
|
Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance & |
|
|
|
|
Administration, Chief Financial Officer, |
|
|
|
|
Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
EX-32
Exhibit 32
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Murray A. Goldberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D. |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
August 8, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray A. Goldberg |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
August 8, 2006 |
|
|